DOWNLOAD
Sub-sector: Banks
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Goldman Sachs’ performance and market share in its core legacy businesses of investment banking and sales and trading have remained very solid, working through soft periods associated with rising rates; with market conditions improving into 2025 these businesses should continue to excel.
With costs related to the exit from consumer businesses in the rear-view, recent results have reflected Goldman’s positioning for re-heating capital markets. Wealth and Asset Management is another likely area of growth in the coming years, where Goldman can leverage its strengths in HNW and alternative asset management as well as growth initiatives.
Business Description
AS OF 29 Dec 2025- Goldman Sachs is now the fifth largest bank holding company in the U.S. with approximately $1.81 tn in assets as of 3Q25 and a market capitalization of $242.8 bn as of November 24th, 2025.
- Goldman Sachs presents its activities through three business segments: Global Banking & Markets, Asset & Wealth Management, and Platform Solutions.
- Goldman's core strengths include equity and FICC sales & trading, investment banking, institutional investment management including alternatives, and high net worth wealth management. It has been expanding its wealth management client base, and adding other stable fee income sources which help diversify its revenue streams.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 29 Dec 2025The early 2020’s were a mixed bag– the foray into consumer lending was costly and ultimately was reversed, diverting capital and management attention and providing a meaningful drag on profitability. Goldman has re-focused on its core businesses to much recent success, though its profile will remain less diversified than large GSIB peers.
Goldman could participate in further M&A to achieve its long-term strategic goals, and recent deals have been add-on deals related to asset/wealth management.
Goldman could be impacted by various risks during periods of market turmoil, but for the most part, has been positively impacted by bouts of volatility which tend to spur more client trading activity– 2025 tariff risks being a recent example. Goldman is subject to significant market and counterparty risks as reflected in the DFAST/SCB regime.
Key Metric
AS OF 29 Dec 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROAE (annual) | 21.3% | 9.7% | 7.3% | 12.0% | 13.6% |
| ROAA (annual) | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| PPNR / Avg. Assets | 1.86% | 1.08% | 3.29% | 3.92% | 1.25% |
| Efficiency Ratio | 54% | 65% | 282% | 266% | 61% |
| Net charge-offs (LTM) / Loans | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.68% | 0.61% | 0.53% |
| Common Dividend Payout | 10.6% | 28.4% | 158.9% | 129.4% | 24.9% |
| CET1 Ratio | 13.6% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 15.0% | 14.3% |
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 5.5% | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) | 122% | 129% | 128% | 126% | 128% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 26 Jan 2026We are moving Goldman Sachs to Underperform from Market perform on valuation, seeing Bank of America as a better option at recent spread levels. We also see Goldman Sachs as among the least likely to reduce debt supply in light of lower debt requirements– Goldman’s issuance needs are far more determined by wholesale funding needs for the trading business than managing to regulatory requirements, particularly in active capital markets conditions as we have been in recently. We have no particular fundamental concerns and in fact expect Goldman to continue to benefit from the momentum in the dealmaking environment and secular growth in trading.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 26, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 13, 2026
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Citigroup is a solid global money center bank that has done a decent job cleaning up legacy issues and fortifying the risk profile in the wake of the GFC, though it still lags peers on several fronts including profitability.
Citi has more geographic diversification than peers owing to its international presences, though the retail side is shrinking considerably as Citi exits most of Asia and Mexico, refocusing around a global wealth management/private bank strategy.
Citi lags on the domestic deposit front, with less than half of the deposit base of money center peers and a much smaller physical footprint, though it has been focused on driving deposit flows the past couple of years.
Business Description
AS OF 29 Dec 2025- Citigroup ranks as the 3rd largest U.S. bank by total assets ($2.64 tn) at 3Q25 and 3rd largest by Total Equity ($214 bn).
- Citi currently is the 4th in terms of U.S. deposits with approximately $795.4 bn as of 3Q25 across 668 branches (S&P Capital IQ). Given the significantly smaller branch footprint, Citi does not generally possess leading market shares in most states besides South Dakota (#1).
- Citi's major business lines include U.S. consumer (mortgages and credit cards) and retail banking, global consumer, global corporate & investment banking, and global payments. The company has a plan to exit 13 international consumer markets, refocusing the non-US footprint around four regional hubs and combining wealth management and the private bank to drive synergies out of the hubs.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Citi still lags peers on profitability (both ROA and ROTCE); CEO Fraser adopted the profitability gap as a key focus point as well, and we see Fraser’s strategic moves (e.g. int’l consumer exits, headcount reduction in management layers) as aimed at capital and expense optimization to improve ROE with some progress showing up recently.
Citi has had some regulatory mishaps in recent years but has made progress towards resolving issues.
Citi’s global footprint makes it more exposed to emerging markets and non-domestic economies; in the near-term, that could create earnings and capital volatility, though tariff-related disruptions did not ultimately negatively impact Citi in 2025.
Key Metric
AS OF 29 Dec 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROAE (annual) | 10.9% | 7.5% | 4.5% | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| ROAA (annual) | 0.92% | 0.61% | 0.38% | 0.51% | 0.55% |
| PPNR / Avg. Assets | 1.02% | 0.97% | 3.93% | 3.56% | 4.38% |
| Efficiency Ratio | 68% | 67% | 272% | 283% | 259% |
| Net Interest Margin (Annual) | 1.94% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 2.29% | 2.34% |
| Net charge-offs (LTM) / Loans | 0.70% | 0.55% | 0.95% | 1.29% | 1.27% |
| Common Dividend Payout | 19% | 27% | 130% | 187% | 125% |
| CET1 Ratio | 12.3% | 13.0% | 13.4% | 13.6% | 13.3% |
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 5.7% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) | 115% | 118% | 116% | 117% | 115% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 24 Feb 2026We are moving Citi to Market perform from Underperform, seeing decent spread value at the widest name among Big 6 GSIBs, particularly considering the context of improved profitability as well as progress on divesting itself of Banamex, the most significant step remaining in right-sizing its international exposure. We no longer see policy (i.e. tariffs) as a particular concern for Citi. Additionally we see possible technical tailwinds from lower supply as debt requirements notch downwards due to the eSLR changes that went through in late 2025.
Recommendation Reviewed: February 24, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 13, 2026
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 29 Dec 2025JPMorgan is one of the strongest and best positioned banks to navigate the current environment, with a well-diversified business model and good competitive positioning across a variety of lending and capital markets areas.
The company continues to deploy its considerable earnings power into reinvestment, specifically around technology where we are bullish on its ability to drive competitive advantages through strategic enhancements and efficiency gains.
Business Description
AS OF 29 Dec 2025- JPMorgan ranks as the largest U.S. bank by total assets ($4.56 tn at 3Q25) and deposits ($2.55 tn at 3Q25).
- JPMorgan ranks 1st in terms of U.S. deposits with approximately $2.08 tn in deposits at YE24 across 4,970 branches (S&P Capital IQ). JPMorgan's footprint includes New York (#1), Texas (#1), California (#2), Illinois (#1), Michigan (#1), Arizona (#1), Ohio (#5), and Florida (#4), among others.
- JPMorgan's major business lines include investment banking, retail banking, card services, treasury & securities services, commercial banking, and asset & wealth management.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Succession planning at JPMorgan has a higher profile than many peers, with CEO Dimon (68 year-old) having held the top spot for over 15 years. Another recent round of shuffling top management yielded a little clarity.
The sector is always exposed to reputational, legislative, administration, and economic risk factors. That said, JPM’s strong capital position and scale leaves it well positioned to adapt to evolving landscapes and macro conditions.
Although not likely a credit risk, JPMorgan may continue to be acquisitive around non-bank financial and ancillary services; but we would expect any deal to be conservatively funded and looking to further technology and fee income strategies (e.g. payments or asset management).
Key Metric
AS OF 29 Dec 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROAE (annual) | 17.0% | 13.2% | 16.0% | 17.4% | 16.7% |
| ROAA (annual) | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| PPNR / Avg. Assets | 1.32% | 1.39% | 7.06% | 7.71% | 1.86% |
| Efficiency Ratio | 59% | 58% | 214% | 220% | 53% |
| Net Interest Margin (Annual) | 1.63% | 2.00% | 2.70% | 2.63% | 2.52% |
| Net charge-offs (LTM) / Loans | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.68% |
| Common Dividend Payout | 24% | 32% | 101% | 97% | 27% |
| CET1 Ratio | 13.1% | 13.2% | 15.0% | 15.7% | 14.8% |
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 5.4% | 5.6% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 5.8% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) | 110% | 110% | 113% | 113% | 113% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 29 Jan 2026We continue to view JPMorgan as the strongest and most defensive name among the Big 6 issuers, but at recent tight spread levels and considering sound fundamentals across the space, we see relatively better value at Bank of America currently. JPMorgan’s 4Q25 results showed continued solid trends, and guidance looks positive for 2026– net interest income is expected to see moderate growth and investment banking pipelines remain healthy. Profitability remains quite strong with core ROTCE around 20%, and excess capital remains robust.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 29, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 13, 2026
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 19 Dec 2025Macquarie was tested during the global financial crisis, but managed to steer through the crisis without reporting losses. A strong balance sheet mitigated liquidity problems, but its banking unit had to turn to Australia’s central bank at that time for support.
The group has an impressive track record of managing risks and achieving good returns, and has built capabilities in a number of areas. Divestments are controlled based on market conditions. It was a beneficiary of market volatility in the commodity space in FY23-24. Its Australian mortgage book has also shown strong but sensible growth.
Business Description
AS OF 19 Dec 2025- Macquarie grew out of the Australian business of Hill Samuel, which commenced operations in 1969. Macquarie Group Ltd (MGL) is the holding company and listed entity, under which there is the banking group Macquarie Bank Ltd (MBL) which consists of the Banking & Financial Services (BFS) and Commodities & Global Markets (CGM) businesses, and a non-banking group which consists of the Macquarie Asset Management (MAM) and Macquarie Capital (MC) businesses.
- From the 1990s, the group has been associated with the "Macquarie Model" which focused on identifying cash-generating infrastructure assets & packaging them into funds that could be sold, with Macquarie taking fees as banker, arranger and asset manager.
- It acquired asset managers including Delaware Investments in the US and Blackmont Capital in Canada, boutique investment bank Fox-Pitt Kelton and specialists such as Tristone Energy (Canada). It acquired US asset manager, Waddell & Reed in April 2021, which added around US$76 bn of assets under management. It has recently sold its public AM business in the US and Europe to Nomura. Adjusting for the Nomura transaction, MAM has AUM of A$720 bn.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 19 Dec 2025Macquarie Group has sizable exposure to credit and equity risk, and so could be adversely impacted by falls in asset prices. In addition, volatile/weak markets could and has impeded its ability to exit some of its investments.
Its earnings profile partially depends on exits and therefore is lumpy in nature. It has till recently managed this risk well, but we are now cautious about its declining group capital surplus (it does not commit to a minimum level).
It is a global leader in infra investments and is well positioned for the green transition (though recently selling down these assets has proved difficult). It has been a strong beneficiary of volatility in commodity markets, a testament to its risk management capabilities.
Its banking unit was subject to enforcement action in Apr-21 by APRA over the incorrect treatment of intra-group funding arrangements resulting in an A$500 mn operational risk overlay as well as LCR and NSFR add-ons. The CGM unit also saw higher regulatory remediation-related spend more recently.
Key Metric
AS OF 19 Dec 2025| AUD mn | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | 1H26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Income | 19,576 | 17,071 | 17,569 | 8,720 |
| Cost/Income | 62.0% | 71.4% | 70.5% | 71.8% |
| Net Profit | 5,182 | 3,522 | 3,715 | 1,655 |
| Return on Equity | 16.9% | 10.8% | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Total Impairments/Op Profit | 6.1% | (7.4%) | 6.6% | 1.2% |
| Annuity Business Profit Contribution | 34.2% | 36.5% | 43.6% | 51.9% |
| MBL CET1 Ratio (APRA) | 13.7% | 13.6% | 12.8% | 12.4% |
| MBL Liquidity Coverage Ratio | 214% | 191% | 175% | 173% |
| MBL Net Stable Funding Ratio | 124% | 115% | 113% | 113% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 11 Feb 2026Macquarie has a strong record of profitability since its inception. Its AM business focused on infrastructure, including green assets, is a global leader. It manages risks and returns effectively, and in FY22+23 was a large beneficiary of O&G and power price volatility. The Aus banking business has steadily gained mortgage marketshare. Large investment disposals from AM and Macquarie Capital led to a record year in FY22; strong commodities outperformance led to another record in FY23. FY24 income was affected by asset realisations and gas & power income. FY25 was helped by asset sales, 1H26 was just 3% up YoY but 3Q was better. Group capital surplus is falling but is comfortable at the bank level. ALM is conservative. Senior spreads at both bank and group are tight.
Recommendation Reviewed: February 11, 2026
Recommendation Changed: February 11, 2026
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.China CITIC Financial Asset Management (Huarong)
- Sector: Financial Services
- Sub Sector: Banks
- Region: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 10 Sep 2025A large impairment loss in FY20 brought CITIC AMC (formerly Huarong) to the brink of insolvency, but a state-led rescue plan provided it with liquidity support and brought its capital back above minimum requirements. CITIC has replaced the MoF as its largest shareholder. CITIC AMC remains as one of the Big 5 state-owned AMCs in China and will continue to perform national services.
On the guidance of the authorities, CITIC AMC has divested almost all of its non-core subsidiaries.
We expect its core operations to remain weak and volatile, until China’s economy is back on the upswing, residents regain confidence in the property market, and improved capital markets lead to better valuations on its securities books.
Business Description
AS OF 10 Sep 2025- China CITIC Financial Asset Management (formerly Huarong) is one of the five major state-owned asset management companies in China. It was first set up in 1999 to take over the bad debts of ICBC.
- The AMCs were originally due to be wound up after dealing with these "policy loans" that had come onto the books of the banks under government direction before their commercialisation, but the AMCs found a new role as commercial bad debt managers.
- CITIC AMC was commercialised in 2012 and completed its IPO on the HK stock exchange in 2015. Since then, it expanded its financial services to banking, financial leasing, securities & futures, trust, as well as consumer finance. However, after heavy losses in FY20, the company has divested almost all of its non-core business as directed by the authorities.
- Following the CITIC-led rescue plan and the equity transfer from the Ministry of Finance (MOF) to CITIC, CITIC has become its largest shareholder (26.46%). Other significant shareholders include MOF (24.76%), Zhongbaorongxin (18.08%), Cinda AMC (4.89%), China Life Insurance (4.50%), National Social Security Fund (3.08%), Warburg Pincus (2.57%), and ICBC Financial AM (2.44%). It was renamed to share the "CITIC" brand in Nov-23.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 10 Sep 2025CITIC’s support is strong (name change, investment in CEB and CITIC Ltd, subsidiary disposal, new management team, etc.) and more meaningful to the company compared to direct ownership by the government.
Derisking continues with lower property exposure, non-core businesses have largely been disposed of and the company is able to focus on its main DDA business per the guidance of the authorities.
While the company was able to deliver profit growth on the back of CITIC support and its associate interest holdings, core performance remains weak, and there could be continued volatility in the name.
AMCs may find it harder to dispose DDAs at good valuations amid a deceleration economic cycle. Longer holding periods will dampen return yields.
Key Metric
AS OF 10 Sep 2025| CNY mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1H25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.10% | (2.20%) | 0.02% | 0.75% | 1.10% |
| ROE | 1.0% | (49.8%) | 3.6% | 18.4% | 21.1% |
| Total Capital Ratio | 13.0% | 15.1% | 15.1% | 15.7% | 16.0% |
| Leverage Ratio | 14.2x | 16.1x | 11.5x | 10.1x | 8.6x |
| Equity/Assets | 0.0% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.7% | 4.0% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 02 Sep 2025CITIC AMC (ex-Huarong) continued to book profits 1H25, helped by investments in three listed SOEs. Core businesses remained weak and volatile, as the company continues to lower valuations on existing DDAs acquired many years ago. Its non-DDA financial assets also have a more volatile performance than peers. CITIC’s support is strong, derisking continues with a meaningful improvement in the provision coverage ratio, non-core businesses have all been cleared, and the company is able to focus on main DDA business per the authorities’ guidance. The capital adequacy ratio has improved meaningfully to 16%, surpassing Cinda. Disclosure remains poor. We expect it to trade ~30 bp wider than CCAMCL.
Recommendation Reviewed: September 02, 2025
Recommendation Changed: July 14, 2025
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 25 Jul 2025IBK benefits from a legally binding solvency guarantee from the Korean government and is viewed as a Korean quasi-sovereign issuer. The bank is listed, but remains majority state-owned. Previous governments had proposed privatizing it, but subsequent governments scrapped these plans. The government intends to keep its stake above 50%, and wants IBK to focus on lending to SMEs and provide earlier stage investment capital.
IBK manages the difficult feat of combining its policy role to support Korean SMEs with performance that compares creditably with Korean commercial banks.
Business Description
AS OF 25 Jul 2025- IBK was established under its own Act in 1961 to assist the development of Korea's small business sector. It claims a 24% market share in SME lending.
- It was listed in the early 1990s, but was re-nationalised following heavy losses in the Asian economic crisis of the late 1990s. It was re-listed in 2003, and is majority owned by the government which holds 59.5%; the National Pension Scheme holds 5.6%, and other policy banks have small stakes (7.2% by Korea Development Bank and 1.8% by the Export-Import Bank of Korea).
- Under Article 43 of the IBK Act, if the bank incurs losses they should be set against its reserves and "if the reserves are not sufficient the Government shall assume the remaining loss". Although this is a solvency guarantee and not an explicit guarantee for the timely payment of debts, we believe the Korean government will ensure IBK is in a position to make such timely payments.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 25 Jul 2025The bank’s ratings are closely tied to the Korean sovereign’s ratings due to its quasi-sovereign status.
Its ratings and its default risk should therefore not be impacted by any deterioration in its financials, provided the government continues to inject new capital when needed, which it is expected to.
Its policy mandate requires it to use at least 70% of its funding for SMEs. Risks are mitigated by its granular SME exposures which are more than 80% secured, including guarantee from state-owned credit guarantee agencies. Korean governments have also always been quick to provide support including capital injections to IBK when needed, with the most recent injection of KRW 1.3 tn during the COVID.
Key Metric
AS OF 25 Jul 2025| KRW bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1H25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Provision Operating Profit / Average Assets | 1.30% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 1.39% | 1.34% |
| ROAA | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| ROAE | 9.2% | 9.5% | 8.8% | 8.1% | 8.8% |
| Provisions/Average Loans | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.52% | 0.44% |
| Nonperforming Loans/Total Loans | 0.85% | 0.85% | 1.05% | 1.34% | 1.37% |
| CET1 Ratio | 11.3% | 11.1% | 11.3% | 11.3% | 11.7% |
| Total Equity/Total Assets | 6.92% | 6.79% | 7.10% | 7.25% | 7.18% |
| NIM | 1.51% | 1.78% | 1.79% | 1.70% | 1.59% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 16 Jun 2025IBK is not wholly government owned – 59.5% direct government ownership, 7.2% KDB and 1.8% KEXIM – but is a policy bank benefiting from a Korean government solvency guarantee. For a policy bank it also has a fairly good track record and manages the difficult feat of combining its policy role to support Korean SMEs with performance that compares creditably with Korean commercial banks. As the leading lender to Korea’s medium and small businesses, IBK plays a key role in the country’s economy, enhanced by the longstanding objective of numerous administrations to achieve a more diversified economy less reliant on the “chaebol”. Successive Korean governments have always been quick to provide support including capital injections to the policy banks when needed.
Recommendation Reviewed: June 16, 2025
Recommendation Changed: March 17, 2017
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.The Export-Import Bank of Korea
- Sector: Financial Services
- Sub Sector: Banks
- Region: Korea
- Bond: EIBKOR 5.125 33
- Indicative Yield-to-Maturity (YTM): 4.55%
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 23 Jul 2025KEXIM is a pure policy bank that is directly and indirectly wholly owned by the government of the Republic of Korea, which is obliged under Article 37 of the Export-Import Bank of Korea Act to fund any losses that cannot be covered by the bank’s reserves.
While this is a solvency guarantee and does not explicitly guarantee the timely repayment of debt, we view it as inconceivable that the Korean authorities would fail to provide KEXIM with support in a timely manner, should this be needed, given its crucial policy role and close government links.
Business Description
AS OF 23 Jul 2025- KEXIM was set up in 1976 to support Korean companies in their overseas business through export credit guarantee programs, as well as providing finance for imports and for overseas investment. It provides funding for both short term trade and long term investment, and manages two government-entrusted funds: the Economic Development Cooperation Fund (EDCF), a Korean official development assistance program, and the Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund (IKCF), an economic cooperation program to promote exchanges with North Korea. It is also a conduit through which the government doled out COVID-19 assistance to affected companies.
- Till 2030, KEXIM aims to preferentially focus on seven sectors (hydrogen energy, wind and solar power, rechargeable battery and energy storage systems (ESS), future mobility, 5G and next-generation semiconductors, pharmaceutical and healthcare, and digital technology and cultural content) which are considered new growth drivers of the Korean economy. It has historically focused on the shipbuilding and engineering & construction industries.
- KEXIM is 100% owned by the Korean government: 76% directly and the remainder through stakes held by the Bank of Korea (7%) and Korea Development Bank (17%). In contrast to peer policy banks IBK and KDB, KEXIM has remained more consistently a policy bank but its role has been adjusted to ensure it complements rather than competes with the Korean commercial banks.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 23 Jul 2025Previous Korean governments have made moves to privatise the other policy banks, but KEXIM has retained its policy bank role and government ownership, which are not likely to change.
Korea’s shipbuilders have long been the largest users of KEXIM’s services. Losses on exposure to the sector, in particular Daewoo Shipbuilding (DSME), pushed KEXIM into the red in 2016 but the government injected capital and its condition has recovered.
Together with KDB, KEXIM has played a key role in helping corporate Korea survive the COVID-19 induced crisis.
Key Metric
AS OF 23 Jul 2025| KRW bn | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Impairment Operating Profit / Average Assets | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| ROAA | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.8% |
| ROAE | 0.7% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 4.7% | 5.2% |
| Provisions/Average Loans | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Nonperforming Loans/Total Loans | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| CET1 Ratio | 13.4% | 13.3% | 11.8% | 12.9% | 13.9% |
| Total Equity/Total Assets | 14.8% | 15.1% | 12.6% | 14.3% | 16.3% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIR/Ave Assets) | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.6% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 06 Jan 2026KEXIM is a wholly government owned policy bank benefiting from a Korean government solvency guarantee. It plays a key role in financing large-ticket exports in particular ships and large-scale overseas engineering projects. Its credit exposures include some industry and borrower concentrations especially to Korea’s shipbuilders and its financial performance has at times suffered. But the Korean government has always acted in a timely manner to endure its solvency, and with this strong backing we view it as a sound credit. We view its secondary levels as in line with where we would expect it to trade, and so continue with our Market perform recommendation.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 06, 2026
Recommendation Changed: September 22, 2020
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.UnionBank of the Philippines
- Sector: Financial Services
- Sub Sector: Banks
- Region: Philippines
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 19 May 2025The bank has historically generated higher returns than peers, but it geared its focus significantly towards the retail segment through acquiring Citi’s Philippine retail portfolio in 2022 and organic growth, which brought retail loans to more than half the total book.
Returns have suffered despite the good boost to core revenues, as asset quality deterioration from the riskier growth direction resulted in high credit costs which we have forewarned. Continued rounds of capital infusions from shareholders have thus been required. The reserve cover is maintained relatively thin.
Business Description
AS OF 19 May 2025- UnionBank of the Philippines was incorporated in 1968, and listed on the Philippine Stock Exchange in June 1992. Principal shareholders are Aboitiz Equity Ventures (49.66%), Insular Life (16%), & Social Security System (18%).
- UBP undertook mergers with International Corporate Bank in 1994 and International Exchange Bank in 2006. City Savings Bank (a thrift bank) was purchased in Jan 2013. City Savings received merger approval with PR Savings (a bank engaged in motorcycle, agri-machinery, & teachers' salary loans) in Dec 2018 from the BSP. It acquired the Citi Philippines retail franchise in 2022.
- The loan book is broadly split 38% wholesale loans and 62% retail loans (comprising 34% credit cards, 21% mortgages and 7% salary loans at the parent, 36% teachers loans, salary loans and motorcycle loans by the thrift bank subsidiary, City Savings Bank, and 1% UnionDigital) at Mar-25.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 19 May 2025Any rating downgrade of the Philippine sovereign or reduction of shareholding by Aboitiz Equity Ventures would negatively impact UBP.
The bank’s aggressive retail expansion has improved the NIM, but negatively impacted overall profitability because of high credit costs (particularly since 2H23) which we have forewarned. We continue to dislike its focus on riskier retail given the already large loan book exposure. It is now focusing on lower risk, shorter term loans at UnionDigital, but the improvement in credit costs have been slow to come through given fallout from higher risk taking in other segments.
The bank however benefits from good shareholder support; it successfully completed a third stock rights offering of PHP 10 bn in 2Q24 (2023: PHP 12 bn; 2022: PHP 40 bn) to shore up capital. Lower opex from 2Q24 onwards is also aiding the bottomline.
Key Metric
AS OF 19 May 2025| PHP mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Interest Margin | 4.60% | 4.80% | 5.50% | 6.00% | 6.30% |
| Reported ROA (Cumulative) | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.8% | 1.1% | 0.5% |
| Reported ROE (Cumulative) | 11.5% | 9.7% | 5.6% | 6.4% | 2.9% |
| PPP ROA | 2.59% | 2.17% | 2.31% | 3.08% | 2.74% |
| CET1 Ratio | 16.3% | 11.3% | 13.9% | 15.6% | 14.9% |
| Total Equity/Total Assets | 13.5% | 13.6% | 15.3% | 17.1% | 16.8% |
| Gross NPL Ratio | 5.00% | 4.80% | 6.27% | 6.89% | 6.90% |
| Net LDR | 63.1% | 67.4% | 73.8% | 77.3% | 74.6% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio | 272% | 148% | 163% | 250% | n/m |
| Net Stable Funding Ratio | 149% | 124% | 124% | 128% | n/m |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 19 Aug 2025UBP’s NIM and core revenue generation is strong thanks to its pivot towards higher yielding retail via organic growth and acquiring Citi’s local retail portfolio. However, returns have suffered as the asset quality repercussions which we have forewarned from its aggressive growth strategy towards the risky retail segments have come through, with elevated credit costs since 2H23. It has slowed loan growth but credit costs have not shown signs of stabilisation given a still high appetite for risk. The reserve cover is maintained relatively thin. Continued shareholder support with yet another stock rights offering in 2Q24 has ensured sufficient capital for now. We drop coverage on UBP given the impending maturity of its sole $ bond in Oct-25.
Recommendation Reviewed: August 19, 2025
Recommendation Changed: January 01, 1970
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Security Bank
- Sector: Financial Services
- Sub Sector: Banks
- Country: Philippines
- Bond: SECBPM 5.5 29
- Indicative Yield-to-Maturity (YTM): 4.704%
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 27 Feb 2025- Security Bank is the 7th largest bank in the Philippines by total assets and was established on June 18, 1951. Its dollar bonds provide better yield pickup compared to its nearest comparable. We remain comfortable with the bond given Security Bank’s total capital ratio of 14.20%, which is 400 basis points above the minimum regulatory hurdle, which can buffer modest credit losses in its loan portfolios should macroeconomic headwinds worsen.
Business Description
AS OF 27 Feb 2025- Security Bank is the 7th largest bank in the Philippines by total assets and was established on June 18, 1951. Security Bank’s businesses include wholesale banking, financial markets, and retail banking. The bank provides commercial banking services such as deposit products, loans and trade finance, domestic and foreign fund transfers, treasury, foreign exchange, and trust services.
- Security Bank's loan portfolio is 32% consumer & MSME, 28% middle market, and 40% corporate as of 3Q 2024.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 27 Feb 2025- Any rating downgrade of the Philippine sovereign would have a negative impact on Security Bank.
- Given the current rate cut environment that drives funding costs lower, Its strategy to aggressively capture market share in the retail and MSME segment might allow the bank to deliver faster growth and higher net interest income margin.
- Rapid expansion on higher yielding retail and MSME segments could worsen asset quality and increase credit costs.
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines