Sector: Financial Services
Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 14 May 2025- Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) is the 3rd largest bank in the Philippines by assets.
- We view the bank as too big to fail given its systemic importance in the country. There is also a strong probability of support from the government in addition to its main shareholder, the Ayala Corporation if needed.
- BPI has a long history, and we view it as a fundamentally sound bank with strong and improved profitability, and comfortable liquidity. Capital management however has become less conservative, and while asset quality is relatively well managed, we are keeping an eye on strong growth in the non-wholesale book.
Business Description
AS OF 14 May 2025-
- The history of the Bank of the Philippine Islands traces back to 1851. It is the oldest bank in the Philippines and South East Asia. It was first listed on the Philippine Stock Exchange in 1971, and became a universal bank in 1982.
- Ayala Corporation, one of the biggest conglomerates in the country, became BPI's dominant shareholder in 1969. Ayala Corp still holds a 49% stake in the bank.
-
- BPI has been acquisitive across the years. It merged with Far East Bank and Trust Company and acquired Ayala Insurance Holdings Corp in 2000. It acquired DBS Bank Philippines in 2001 and Prudential Bank Philippines in 2005. DBS was a shareholder of BPI but exited its position in 2013. More recently in January 2024, it completed the acquisition of the Gokongwei conglomerate's Robinsons Bank.
- The bank is predominantly a corporate bank with 71% of its loan book outstanding to corporates, and the balance to MSME and retail as of 1Q25. The bank's target is to grow the MSME and retail segment to a 30% share of loans.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 14 May 2025- Any rating downgrade of the Philippine sovereign would have a negative impact on BPI.
- Direct impact from US tariffs is limited given that the Philippines is not a major goods exporter, but there will be second order effects from a slowdown in regional and global growth. Loan growth will continue to be retail/MSME driven in FY25 particularly as some businesses put borrowing plans on hold.
- BPI’s strong focus on unsecured retail and MSME growth has put pressure on asset quality, and provision reserves have also been pared down. We see asset quality risks, but BPI’s large corporates-focused book (71% of total loans) provide comfort and provisioning capacity is strong.
- We also expect increased margin pressure with more rate cuts anticipated from the BSP now in 2025 to support growth. However, management expects to maintain a flattish FY25 NIM, supported by RRR reductions and a continued pivot towards better yielding retail/MSME.
Key Metric
AS OF 14 May 2025PHP mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1Q25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPP ROA | 2.01% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.96% |
Reported ROA (Cumulative) | 1.10% | 1.59% | 1.93% | 1.98% | 2.05% |
Reported ROE (Cumulative) | 8.4% | 13.1% | 15.4% | 15.1% | 15.4% |
Net Interest Margin | 3.30% | 3.59% | 4.09% | 4.31% | 4.49% |
CET1 Ratio | 15.8% | 15.1% | 15.3% | 13.9% | 14.7% |
Total Equity/Total Assets | 12.1% | 12.2% | 12.4% | 13.0% | 13.7% |
NPL Ratio | 2.49% | 1.76% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.26% |
Provisions/Loans | 0.91% | 0.58% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.53% |
Liquidity Coverage Ratio | 221% | 195% | 207% | 159% | n/m |
Net Stable Funding Ratio | 155% | 149% | 154% | 146% | n/m |
Our View
AS OF 21 May 2025Despite the heightened risk associated with growth in non-wholesale loans, BPI continues to demonstrate strong liquidity, a well-managed corporate loan portfolio (which accounts for 73% of total loans), and a solid underwriting track record. With adequate provisioning and a robust capital position, the bank remains a stable and dependable option for bond investors.
Recommendation Reviewed: May 21, 2025
Recommendation Changed: May 21, 2025
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 07 May 2025BDO Unibank (BDO) is the largest bank in the Philippines in terms of assets & market share.
Given its size and systemic importance, BDO is considered too big to fail and is strongly likely to be supported by its controlling shareholder SM Investments, as well as the Philippine government in times of stress.
BDO is widely viewed as the soundest bank in the country given its strong fundamentals, well-diversified businesses, and good management.
Business Description
AS OF 07 May 2025- BDO Unibank was established as Acme Savings Bank in 1968, and was then acquired by SM Investments in 1976. It became a commercial bank in 1994 and a universal bank in 1996.
- BDO was listed in May 2002. SM Investments remains the bank's largest shareholder with a 41% stake.
- BDO has expanded through a series of M&As. Among its key transactions, it merged with Dao Heng Bank Philippines in 2001, Banco Santander Philippines in 2003, UOB Philippines in 2005, Equitable PCI Bank in 2007, GE Money Bank in 2009, Citibank Savings, DB Trust and Real Bank in 2014, One Network Bank in 2015 (the largest rural bank in the Philippines), and RB Pandi's banking business in 2019. It also acquired the insurance business of Generali in the Philippines in 2016.
- BDO has the largest distribution network in the country and is ranked the largest bank in terms of consolidated resources, total assets, loans, deposits and trust funds under management.
- Its loan book is split 50% large corporates, 25% middle market, and 25% consumer at 1Q25. 42% of the consumer book comprises mortgages, 27% are credit cards, 13% are auto loans and the remaining are personal loans (13%) and others (5%).
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 07 May 2025Direct impact from US tariffs is limited given that the Philippines is not a major goods exporter, but the second order effects from a slowdown in regional and global growth are not insignificant.
Loan growth is thus likely to continue to be retail-led in FY25 as businesses put borrowing plans on hold. We see few asset quality risks for BDO given a comfortable NPL cover (1Q25: 143%) and build up of the CET1 ratio (1Q25: 14.4%), as well as BDO’s large corporates book (50% of total loans) and underwriting track record.
We see increased margin pressure with more rate cuts anticipated from the BSP now in 2025 to support growth. An overall NIM reduction in FY25 is likely despite reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cuts and an increasing retail share in the overall loan mix.
Any rating downgrade of the Philippine sovereign would negatively impact BDO.
Key Metric
AS OF 07 May 2025PHP mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1Q25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIM | 4.05% | 4.14% | 4.37% | 4.35% | 4.31% |
Reported ROA (Cumulative) | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
Reported ROE (Cumulative) | 10.4% | 13.0% | 15.2% | 15.1% | 13.8% |
Equity/Assets | 11.7% | 11.3% | 11.5% | 11.8% | 12.1% |
CET1 Ratio | 13.6% | 13.4% | 13.8% | 14.1% | 14.4% |
NPL ratio | 2.8% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Provisions/Loans | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.37% |
PPP ROA | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Liquidity Coverage Ratio | 145% | 141% | 123% | 132% | 131% |
Net Stable Funding Ratio | 124% | 124% | 124% | 122% | n/m |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 21 May 2025BDO is the largest bank in the Philippines. Management is well-regarded, the business is well-diversified and it is the market leader in many business lines. The NIM has peaked with the turn in policy rates, but non-interest income is close to a third of operating income given good fee generation and overall core profitability is strong. Management aims to sustain returns via normalized credit costs, asset rebalancing towards loans and the reduced RRR requirement. We remain comfortable with BDO given the large corporate book and comfortable NPL cover, as well as underwriting track record, which provide comfort around the robust growth in retail loans. Capital has also been steadily built up with the CET1 ratio at 14.4% at 1Q25. We have BDO on Market perform.
Recommendation Reviewed: May 21, 2025
Recommendation Changed: November 28, 2023
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 06 May 2025Woori FG’s performance record had been less consistent than some of its more commercially focused peers but improved in FY21-22. Its FY23 performance lagged behind its peers, affected by not only the kitchen sinking provisioning exercise but also uniquely amongst the FGs, taking a hit on its other non-interest income. It posted peer-leading profit growth in FY24, partially thanks to not having the ELS compensation issue which hit the other three FGs in 1Q24, but 1Q25 performance was softer due to the same reason.
Asset quality used to be a strength with the lowest NPL ratios and credit costs among the four FGs but has deteriorated since 2Q23, and we no longer see a gap with the other FGs.
Capital standing is a relative weakness with the CET 1 ratio at 12.4% compared to above 13% at peers.
Business Description
AS OF 06 May 2025- Woori's predecessor banks were rescued by the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) following the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis.
- Woori Bank is one of Korea's 'Big Four' commercial banks. It previously owned two regional banks, Kwangju and Kyongnam, but these were spun off in 2014. Woori also sold its stake in Woori Investment Securities and its savings bank and life insurance arms to NH Financial Group.
- Woori set up a HoldCo (Woori FG) in January 2019 to expand into more diversified business lines, particularly investment banking. It used to have a HoldCo, but it was dissolved in 2014 when it was merged with Woori Bank.
- Its main subsidiaries are 100%-owned Woori Card, Woori Financial Capital (auto leasing), Woori Investment Bank and 72.3%-owned Woori Asset Trust. In August 2024, the group relaunched securities business by acquiring Korea Foss Securities and merging it with Woori Investment. The group has also obtained conditional approval to take over Tongyang Life Insurance and ABL Life Insurance.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 06 May 2025Woori FG was for many years majority-owned by the Korean government via the Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC), but KDIC has steadily been selling down its shareholding, and Woori purchased and cancelled the remaining shares in 2024. That said, Woori FG remains a large, systemically important bank with strong potential government backing if needed.
Woori FG is less diversified than its peers, with most of its earnings coming from the bank and small contributions from the card and leasing businesses. The group has accelerated its M&A pace this year, relaunching securities business and in the process of acquiring insurance targets.
Its CET 1 ratio is ~1% behind the other three FGs. Management plans to improve it to 12.5% by 2025-year end and 13% in the mid-long term.
Key Metric
AS OF 06 May 2025KRW bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1Q25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-Provision Profit ROA | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.10% | 1.17% | 0.99% |
ROA | 0.66% | 0.70% | 0.54% | 0.61% | 0.49% |
ROE | 10.6% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 9.3% | 7.3% |
Provisions/Loans | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
NPL Ratio | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.35% | 0.57% | 0.69% |
Woori Bank CET1 Ratio | 13.0% | 12.7% | 13.2% | 13.1% | 13.5% |
Equity/Assets | 6.45% | 6.58% | 6.71% | 6.83% | 6.67% |
Net Interest Margin Bank + Card | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 1.70% | 1.70% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 28 Apr 2025Woori FG was for some years the weakest of Korea’s Big 4 Financial Groups with a less consistent track record of managing risk and returns. Operating performance had shown an improvement for the past few years but disappointed in FY23. FY24 results were peer-leading, mainly supported by non-interest income. The group has been seeking opportunities to expand its non-bank businesses. Its new securities entity launched in August 2024 and the group is finalizing a deal to acquire two insurer. The capital impact of the two transactions is small. Both the group and the bank CET1 ratios are behind peers. KDIC’s stake in the group has been completely sold. We have a Market perform recommendation but see the trading levels of its AT1 NC07/29 as attractive.
Recommendation Reviewed: April 28, 2025
Recommendation Changed: April 24, 2017
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 06 May 2025Shinhan FG was the best-managed of the large Korean financial groups over many years. During the Asian Financial Crisis, it took advantage of the opportunity to acquire competitors and other businesses, increasing its scale and expanding its business lines.
Its performance has been more variable in the past few years. After a bumpy 2020, it had a better FY21 and FY22, thanks to rising interest rates. However, operating performance turned weak again in FY23, and its FY24 profit growth was softer than peers, impacted by non-bank performance.
In addition to owning a Big 4 bank in Korea, Shinhan FG also has a diversified non-banking business portfolio, including a leading credit card company and a top 10 securities firm.
Business Description
AS OF 06 May 2025- Shinhan Financial Group (Shinhan FG) is one of Korea's most diversified financial groups and the holding company of the second largest Korean bank - Shinhan Bank. It also has credit cards, securities, asset management and insurance subsidiaries.
- Shinhan Bank was set up in 1982 with seed capital from Korean residents in Japan. It was more professionally managed than the heavily politicised older banks and came through the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis in relatively good shape, taking the opportunity to acquire the larger and much longer-established Chohung Bank in 2003.
- In 2007, it made another timely acquisition, buying LG Card from its creditors after it failed during the 2003 Korean consumer lending crisis. Shinhan Card is the largest card issuer in Korea.
- Shinhan is also looking for overseas opportunities where growth is strong and Korean businesses have a presence, with a focus on Vietnam (where Shinhan Card also bought a consumer finance business in 2019) and Indonesia.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 06 May 2025As one of Korea’s “Big Four” financial groups, we believe Shinhan FG would likely receive governmental support if needed.
Asset quality pressure has been rising from domestic real estate project financing at non-bank subsidiaries, with credit costs rising from very low levels. Management expects FY25 credit costs to normalize to the mid-30 bp from 47 bp in FY24, though we remain cautious about this outlook.
Loan growth is expected to slow down this year due to both weaker demand and the need to defend its 13% CET 1 ratio target.
Profit growth may encounter challenges if there is volatility in the KRW, which could lead to significant FX losses, or if the high-rate environment in the US persists, causing further overseas CRE valuation losses.
Key Metric
AS OF 06 May 2025KRW bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1Q25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-Provision Profit ROA | 1.11% | 1.10% | 3.89% | 3.89% | 1.28% |
ROA | 0.66% | 0.72% | 0.66% | 0.63% | 0.83% |
ROE | 9.2% | 10.0% | 8.6% | 8.4% | 11.4% |
Provisions/Average Loans | 0.28% | 0.34% | 0.78% | 0.66% | 0.41% |
NPL Ratio | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.71% | 0.81% |
CET1 Ratio | 13.10% | 12.79% | 13.17% | 13.06% | 13.27% |
Equity/Assets | 7.3% | 7.6% | 7.8% | 7.6% | 7.6% |
Net Interest Margin | 1.81% | 1.96% | 5.91% | 5.85% | 1.91% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 06 May 2025Shinhan FG is one of the four nation-wide commercial banking groups in Korea, with a leading credit card arm. It had over many years the best operating track record, but have shown more consistent performance with peers in recent years. Its topline performance lagged behind its peers in 1Q25, but its ROE was high and just behind KBFG. Shinhan showed commitment to enhancing its NPL coverage ratio, which provides some reassurance, compared to its peers. The group has set an ambitious ROE target of a 50+ bp improvement for FY25, while we maintain a more cautious outlook. We have a Market perform recommendation at both group and bank levels.
Recommendation Reviewed: May 06, 2025
Recommendation Changed: September 22, 2020
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 06 May 2025Hana Financial Group (Hana FG) struggled for several years to make its acquisition of the former Korea Exchange Bank a success, but results improved dramatically in 2015 as revenues grew and cost efficiencies improved. It has produced strong results since 2020.
The group is looking for inorganic growth in its non-bank businesses as it has fallen behind Shinhan FG and KBFG in this area, but has so far shied away from a large acquisition.
Hana Bank has the highest CET 1 ratio among the Korean Big 4 banks.
Business Description
AS OF 06 May 2025- Hana FG is the third-largest financial group in South Korea. From small origins as a finance company in the 1970s, after the 1997 Asian crisis, Hana grew by acquiring three other banks, including the much older Seoul Bank, which had a banking and trust management business.
- Hana FG bought Korea Exchange Bank (KEB) from Lone Star in 2012 after overcoming many hurdles, but due to staff union opposition, it could not merge with Hana Bank until 2015.
- Hana FG's overseas business is smaller than its peers, and is complemented by KEB's extensive international operations. KEB was started in 1967 as a government-owned bank specializing in foreign exchange. It had a leading share in FX transactions and trade finance among Korean banks.
- Hana FG has shown good growth in its credit card and securities non-bank businesses, but is less diversified than its larger peers KB and Shinhan, which have also acquired insurance companies. Its latest acquisition (in 2019) was a 15% stake in Vietnam's state-owned Bank for Investment & Development (BIDV). In 2023, Hana FG decided not to proceed with the acquisition of KDB Life Insurance after two months of due diligence.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 06 May 2025Hana FG’s credit costs at 29 bp in FY24 and 1Q25 were lower than peers (mostly in the range of 40-50 bp). However, the group’s NPL coverage ratio was also ~14-18 ppt behind peers.
NIMs are lower than those of KB and Shinhan at both the group and bank levels. The profit contribution from non-bank entities to group profits is also lagging behind these two peers. Both metrics are comparable to Woori’s.
Loan growth was softer than peers in FY24 and 1Q25 as the bank is putting more focus on RWA management and capital enhancement.
Key Metric
AS OF 06 May 2025KRW bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1Q25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-Provision Profit ROA | 1.07% | 1.10% | 1.11% | 1.00% | 1.12% |
ROA | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.59% | 0.61% | 0.72% |
ROE | 10.9% | 10.1% | 9.0% | 9.1% | 10.6% |
Provisions/Loans | 0.16% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.32% | 0.29% |
NPL Ratio | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.62% | 0.70% |
CET1 Ratio | 13.8% | 13.2% | 13.2% | 13.2% | 13.2% |
Equity/Assets | 6.8% | 6.4% | 6.6% | 6.7% | 6.7% |
Net Interest Margin | 1.66% | 1.83% | 1.82% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 28 Apr 2025Hana FG grew through acquisitions but only in 2015 was it able to merge its two main bank units to form KEB-Hana Bank. Hana’s management has a good record but for some years struggled to extract value from its acquisitions. Its performance for the past few years has generally been strong. More focus has been put on RWA management and capital enhancement since 2H24. There is potential for further improvements in the non-bank segment. Hana’s credit costs were lower than those of its peers, but this has also resulted in the lowest NPL coverage ratio among the four FGs. The group aims to maintain a CET1 ratio of 13-13.5%. We have a Market perform recommendation at both group and bank levels.
Recommendation Reviewed: April 28, 2025
Recommendation Changed: April 24, 2017
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 08 Apr 2025A large impairment loss in FY20 brought CITIC AMC (formerly Huarong) to the brink of insolvency, but a state-led rescue plan provided it with liquidity support and brought its capital back above minimum requirements. CITIC has replaced the MoF as its largest shareholder. CITIC AMC remains as one of the Big 5 state-owned AMCs in China and will continue to perform national services.
On the guidance of the authorities, CITIC AMC has divested almost all of its non-core subsidiaries.
We expect its core operations to remain weak and volatile, until China’s economy is back on the upswing, residents regain confidence in the property market, and improved capital markets lead to better valuations on its securities books.
Business Description
AS OF 08 Apr 2025- China CITIC Financial Asset Management (formerly Huarong) is one of the five major state-owned asset management companies in China. It was first set up in 1999 to take over the bad debts of ICBC.
- The AMCs were originally due to be wound up after dealing with these "policy loans" that had come onto the books of the banks under government direction before their commercialisation, but the AMCs found a new role as commercial bad debt managers.
- CITIC AMC was commercialised in 2012 and completed its IPO on the HK stock exchange in 2015. Since then, it expanded its financial services to banking, financial leasing, securities & futures, trust, as well as consumer finance. However, after heavy losses in FY20, the company has divested almost all of its non-core business as directed by the authorities.
- Following the CITIC-led rescue plan and the equity transfer from the Ministry of Finance (MOF) to CITIC, CITIC has become its largest shareholder (26.46%). Other significant shareholders include MOF (24.76%), Zhongbaorongxin (18.08%), Cinda AMC (4.89%), China Life Insurance (4.50%), National Social Security Fund (3.08%), Warburg Pincus (2.57%), and ICBC Financial AM (2.44%). It was renamed to share the "CITIC" brand in Nov-23.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 08 Apr 2025CITIC’s support is strong (name change, investment in CEB and CITIC Ltd, subsidiary disposal, new management team, etc.) and more meaningful to the company compared to direct ownership by the government.
Derisking continues with lower property exposure, non-core businesses have largely been disposed of and the company is able to focus on its main DDA business per the guidance of the authorities.
While the company was able to deliver profit growth on the back of CITIC support and its associate interest holdings, core performance remains weak, and there could be continued volatility in the name.
AMCs may find it harder to dispose DDAs at good valuations amid a deceleration economic cycle. Longer holding periods and lower fair values of acquired DDAs could dampen return yields and increase the NPL ratio of restructuring-type DDAs.
Key Metric
AS OF 08 Apr 2025CNY mn | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROA | (6.40%) | 0.10% | (2.20%) | 0.02% | 0.75% |
ROE | (147.6%) | 1.0% | (49.8%) | 3.6% | 18.4% |
Total Capital Ratio | 4.2% | 13.0% | 15.1% | 15.1% | 15.7% |
Leverage Ratio | 1,330.0x | 14.2x | 16.1x | 11.5x | 10.1x |
Equity/Assets | 1.1% | 3.8% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 5.7% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 30 Jun 2025CITIC AMC continued to post profits in FY24, largely helped by investments in CEB, BOC and CITIC Ltd. Core businesses remained weak and volatile, as the company continues to lower valuations on existing DDAs acquired many years ago. Its non-DDA financial assets also have a more volatile performance than peers. CITIC’s support is strong, derisking continues with a meaningful improvement in the provision coverage ratio, non-core businesses have all been cleared, and the company is able to focus on main DDA business per the authorities’ guidance. However, we expect to continue to see high earnings volatility and poor disclosure. We move it to O/P as we expect its spread pickup over Cinda to tighten from the current 60-65 bp to 30-40 bp.
Recommendation Reviewed: June 30, 2025
Recommendation Changed: June 30, 2025
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 28 Mar 2025CBA has a very strong franchise in Australia; it is the leader in the retail market and is making good progress in challenging NAB in business banking.
It has been the best managed of the Australian banks for many years, and has outperformed peers. It lost some of its luster in the latter part of the 2010s due to regulatory and compliance lapses amid charges of complacency, but has since improved into a better institution.
Its capital and liquidity position is robust, while asset quality is strong.
Business Description
AS OF 28 Mar 2025- Originally established by the Australian government in 1911, CBA functioned for some time as Australia's central bank until the establishment of the Reserve Bank of Australia in 1959. It remained under government ownership until the early 1990s, after which it underwent a transformation from a bureaucratic public sector bank into a widely respected commercial organisation.
- Over the past twenty years, CBA has consolidated its position as the leading bank in Australia with a 24-28% share in household deposits and lending, helped by its acquisition during the 2008 crisis of Bank of Western Australia.
- In New Zealand it owns ASB Bank, but otherwise has been selling non-core assets, including its life insurance business.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 28 Mar 2025CBA’s financial health is closely linked to the Australian economy, in particular retail credit quality, mainly housing loans.
Earnings/NIMs are under pressure from strong mortgage market and deposit competition. Business banking growth however has been stellar and highly profitable.
Losses on housing loans have been minimal; the low stock on the housing market has led to home prices rising from Mar-23 onwards, contrary to expectations. Low rental vacancy rates (1%) and low unemployment rates (~4%) have been very supportive of asset quality. House prices are currently going through a soggy patch, but we are not concerned.
Key Metric
AS OF 28 Mar 2025AUD mn | Y21 | Y22 | Y23 | Y24 | 1H25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Return on Equity | 11.7% | 12.7% | 14.0% | 13.6% | 13.8% |
Total Revenues Margin | 2.3% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.1% |
Cost/Income | 47.0% | 46.3% | 43.7% | 45.0% | 45.2% |
APRA CET1 Ratio | 13.1% | 11.5% | 12.2% | 12.3% | 12.2% |
International CET1 Ratio | 19.4% | 18.6% | 19.1% | 19.1% | 18.8% |
APRA Leverage Ratio | 6.0% | 5.2% | 5.1% | 5.0% | 4.9% |
Impairment Charge/Avg Loans | 0.1% | (0.0%) | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Gross Impaired Loans/Total Loans | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% |
Liquidity Coverage Ratio | 129% | 130% | 131% | 136% | 127% |
Net Stable Funding Ratio | 129% | 130% | 124% | 116% | 116% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 14 May 2025CBA operates as a well-oiled machine in the Australian banking market. It has the leading position in mortgages and deposits, and is challenging NAB in business banking. An AUSTRAC penalty in 2018 damaged its reputation and remediation costs impacted earnings for a couple of years. The bank sold a number of its non-bank business and equity investments to simplify and focus on its core domestic businesses. Strong mortgage market and deposit competition had capped NIMs despite higher cash rates. Business banking growth has been stellar and highly profitable. Asset quality is comfortable. Its CET1 ratio though strong has declined to below ANZ’s. It is our preferred name amongst the Aussie banks. Its seniors are fair, and we prefer its shorter call and bullet Tier 2s, the NC29s and bullet 31s.
Recommendation Reviewed: May 14, 2025
Recommendation Changed: October 05, 2016
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 27 Feb 2025- Security Bank is the 7th largest bank in the Philippines by total assets and was established on June 18, 1951. Its dollar bonds provide better yield pickup compared to its nearest comparable. We remain comfortable with the bond given Security Bank’s total capital ratio of 14.20%, which is 400 basis points above the minimum regulatory hurdle, which can buffer modest credit losses in its loan portfolios should macroeconomic headwinds worsen.
Business Description
AS OF 27 Feb 2025- Security Bank is the 7th largest bank in the Philippines by total assets and was established on June 18, 1951. Security Bank’s businesses include wholesale banking, financial markets, and retail banking. The bank provides commercial banking services such as deposit products, loans and trade finance, domestic and foreign fund transfers, treasury, foreign exchange, and trust services.
- Security Bank's loan portfolio is 32% consumer & MSME, 28% middle market, and 40% corporate as of 3Q 2024.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 27 Feb 2025- Any rating downgrade of the Philippine sovereign would have a negative impact on Security Bank.
- Given the current rate cut environment that drives funding costs lower, Its strategy to aggressively capture market share in the retail and MSME segment might allow the bank to deliver faster growth and higher net interest income margin.
- Rapid expansion on higher yielding retail and MSME segments could worsen asset quality and increase credit costs.
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 27 Dec 2024The Export-Import Bank of India (EXIMBK) was founded in 1982. Its credit standing is built upon the key role it plays in the promotion of India’s cross border trade and investment development, as India’s official export credit agency.
EXIMBK is 100% owned by the Government of India. Given its crucial policy role, close governmental links and quasi-sovereign status, we view it as inconceivable that the Indian government would fail to provide EXIMBK with support in a timely manner, if needed.
Business Description
AS OF 27 Dec 2024- EXIMBK presently serves as a growth engine for the internationalization efforts of Indian businesses, facilitating the import of technology and export product development, export production, export marketing, pre- and post-shipment, as well as overseas investment.
- As at F1H25, EXIMBK's loan portfolio was principally made up of export finance (68%) and term loans to exporters (18%), with the remaining 14% split among the financing of overseas investment, import finance, and export facilitation. 44% come under the policy business/face GOI risk while the remaining 56% are to the commercial business.
- By geography, the bank has a primary exposure of 33% to Africa, 56% to Asia (mainly South Asia), 7% to Europe and the Americas, and the remaining to the rest of the world.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 27 Dec 2024As a quasi-sovereign issuer with backstops from the Government of India and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), it is viewed as a proxy to the sovereign. Any downgrade to India’s sovereign rating will flow through to EXIMBK as well.
EXIMBK’s policy role may require it to, at times, take on exposures that could lead to financial losses. This has led to poor asset quality and high impairment charges similar to the public sector commercial banks during the years leading up to the pandemic.
Capital standing, however, is robust thanks to capital infusions from the Government of India which have been stepped up in recent years – INR 50 bn was injected in FY19, followed by infusions of INR 15 bn and INR 13 bn in FY20 and FY21 respectively. The bank received INR 7.5 bn in FY22 despite capital levels remaining strong during the year. No infusions have been made since FY23 due to the comfortable capital position.
Key Metric
AS OF 27 Dec 2024INR mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1H25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Interest Margin (Annual) | 1.84% | 2.19% | 2.29% | 2.06% | 1.70% |
ROAA | 0.19% | 0.54% | 1.04% | 1.43% | 1.16% |
ROAE | 1.49% | 3.97% | 7.76% | 11.47% | 9.54% |
Equity/Assets | 13.23% | 14.12% | 12.87% | 12.06% | 12.31% |
Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 24.0% | 28.6% | 23.7% | 19.6% | 27.4% |
Gross NPA Ratio | 6.69% | 3.56% | 4.09% | 1.94% | 2.02% |
Provisions/Loans | 2.46% | 0.90% | 1.24% | 0.29% | 0.16% |
Pre-Impairment Operating Profit / Average Assets | 2.13% | 2.31% | 2.41% | 2.12% | 1.68% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 06 Jan 2025Exim Bank of India is the country’s key policy bank with full government support. It provides financial assistance to exporters and importers with a view to promote trade in India. It is 100% owned by the Government of India (GoI) and is a proxy to the India sovereign in international debt markets (quasi-sovereign status). The bank cannot be liquidated without the government’s approval and has a track record of government capital infusions. The bank’s asset quality is back on track after some wobbles in previous years. Capital levels are strong. We maintain a Market perform recommendation on the bank.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 06, 2025
Recommendation Changed: January 04, 2021
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank


How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.

Fundamental View
AS OF 30 Dec 2024BMO is geographically diversified within Canada & via its commercial banking business in the U.S. and is also well-diversified by revenue with contribution from fee income businesses.
Credit has performed worse than peers in 2024, but losses are likely to stabilize and gradually improve in 2025, based on underwriting and risk management changes in recent years as well as seasoning effects.
Business Description
AS OF 20 Dec 2024- BMO Financial Group is the fourth largest depository institution in Canada with C$1.41 tn in assets as of F4Q24 and a market capitalization of US$70 bn. Total deposits were C$982 bn at F4Q24.
- BMO operates 1,890 branches in Canada and the United States in 2024.
- As of YE23, BMO had 1,013 branches within the United States, mostly in the Midwest. BMO ranked 11th in deposit market share in the U.S. (SNL), with a top-2 share in Illinois.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 20 Dec 2024BMO has a strong core deposit base in Canada and in the U.S., which mitigates the potential for a liquidity event. BMO remains well-capitalized relative to requirements with a target CET1 ratio of 12.5% (13.6% at F4Q24).
BMO closed the acquisition of Bank of the West from BNP Paribas in February 2023, significantly expanding its footprint in the U.S. We don’t expect deal integration to have much impact on the credit profile.
We view real estate-related risk in Canada as manageable for BMO given low LTV of exposures in vulnerable markets and conservative underwriting. Commercial real estate accounts for ~10% of total loans, and office is quite manageable at ~1% of total.
Credit deterioration was worse than peers in 2024, leading to elevated provisions in 2H24; BMO has indicated the problem loans were mostly originated in 2021, and provisions should start to improve in 2025.
Key Metric
AS OF 20 Dec 2024$ mn | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | LTM 4Q24 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | 17,461 | 20,509 | 26,727 | 21,694 | 24,095 |
Net Income | 3,790 | 6,167 | 10,519 | 3,291 | 5,380 |
ROAE | 0.94% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.92% |
NIM | 1.58% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
Net Charge-offs / Loans | 0.25% | 0.14% | 0.08% | 0.14% | 0.39% |
Total Assets | 713,376 | 797,018 | 860,451 | 969,851 | 1,011,587 |
Unsecured LT Funding | 51,916 | 51,915 | 64,886 | 63,418 | 66,700 |
CET1 Ratio (Fully-Phased-In) | 11.9% | 13.7% | 16.7% | 12.5% | 13.6% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 29 May 2025We maintain our Market perform for BMO, with our preference within the group remaining to trade up in quality to RBC and TD. Surprising deterioration in asset quality metrics was the story throughout the latter part of F2024, with provisions well above historical average levels. Management has attributed the weakness largely to large wholesale loans to new borrowers originated in 2021, but given the steady climb in reserve coverage as well as changes to risk management and underwriting in recent years, BMO is confident quarterly provision ratios should moderate across F2025 alongside further potential benefits from efficiency initatives. This appeared to be the case thus far in F1H25.
Recommendation Reviewed: May 29, 2025
Recommendation Changed: August 26, 2020
Who We Recommend
Korea Gas Corp.
Macquarie Bank
Siam Commercial Bank

