Region: US
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Goldman Sachs’ performance and market share in its core legacy businesses of investment banking and sales and trading have remained very solid, working through soft periods associated with rising rates; with market conditions improving into 2025 these businesses should continue to excel.
With costs related to the exit from consumer businesses in the rear-view, recent results have reflected Goldman’s positioning for re-heating capital markets. Wealth and Asset Management is another likely area of growth in the coming years, where Goldman can leverage its strengths in HNW and alternative asset management as well as growth initiatives.
Business Description
AS OF 29 Dec 2025- Goldman Sachs is now the fifth largest bank holding company in the U.S. with approximately $1.81 tn in assets as of 3Q25 and a market capitalization of $242.8 bn as of November 24th, 2025.
- Goldman Sachs presents its activities through three business segments: Global Banking & Markets, Asset & Wealth Management, and Platform Solutions.
- Goldman's core strengths include equity and FICC sales & trading, investment banking, institutional investment management including alternatives, and high net worth wealth management. It has been expanding its wealth management client base, and adding other stable fee income sources which help diversify its revenue streams.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 29 Dec 2025The early 2020’s were a mixed bag– the foray into consumer lending was costly and ultimately was reversed, diverting capital and management attention and providing a meaningful drag on profitability. Goldman has re-focused on its core businesses to much recent success, though its profile will remain less diversified than large GSIB peers.
Goldman could participate in further M&A to achieve its long-term strategic goals, and recent deals have been add-on deals related to asset/wealth management.
Goldman could be impacted by various risks during periods of market turmoil, but for the most part, has been positively impacted by bouts of volatility which tend to spur more client trading activity– 2025 tariff risks being a recent example. Goldman is subject to significant market and counterparty risks as reflected in the DFAST/SCB regime.
Key Metric
AS OF 29 Dec 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROAE (annual) | 21.3% | 9.7% | 7.3% | 12.0% | 13.6% |
| ROAA (annual) | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| PPNR / Avg. Assets | 1.86% | 1.08% | 3.29% | 3.92% | 1.25% |
| Efficiency Ratio | 54% | 65% | 282% | 266% | 61% |
| Net charge-offs (LTM) / Loans | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.68% | 0.61% | 0.53% |
| Common Dividend Payout | 10.6% | 28.4% | 158.9% | 129.4% | 24.9% |
| CET1 Ratio | 13.6% | 15.0% | 14.4% | 15.0% | 14.3% |
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 5.5% | 5.8% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) | 122% | 129% | 128% | 126% | 128% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 16 Jan 2026We are moving Goldman Sachs to Underperform from Market perform on valuation, seeing Bank of America as a better option at recent spread levels. We also see Goldman Sachs as among the least likely to reduce debt supply in light of lower debt requirements– Goldman’s issuance needs are far more determined by wholesale funding needs for the trading business than managing to regulatory requirements, particularly in active capital markets conditions as we have been in recently. We have no particular fundamental concerns and in fact expect Goldman to continue to benefit from the momentum in the dealmaking environment and secular growth in trading.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 16, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 13, 2026
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Citigroup is a solid global money center bank that has done a decent job cleaning up legacy issues and fortifying the risk profile in the wake of the GFC, though it still lags peers on several fronts including profitability.
Citi has more geographic diversification than peers owing to its international presences, though the retail side is shrinking considerably as Citi exits most of Asia and Mexico, refocusing around a global wealth management/private bank strategy.
Citi lags on the domestic deposit front, with less than half of the deposit base of money center peers and a much smaller physical footprint, though it has been focused on driving deposit flows the past couple of years.
Business Description
AS OF 29 Dec 2025- Citigroup ranks as the 3rd largest U.S. bank by total assets ($2.64 tn) at 3Q25 and 3rd largest by Total Equity ($214 bn).
- Citi currently is the 4th in terms of U.S. deposits with approximately $795.4 bn as of 3Q25 across 668 branches (S&P Capital IQ). Given the significantly smaller branch footprint, Citi does not generally possess leading market shares in most states besides South Dakota (#1).
- Citi's major business lines include U.S. consumer (mortgages and credit cards) and retail banking, global consumer, global corporate & investment banking, and global payments. The company has a plan to exit 13 international consumer markets, refocusing the non-US footprint around four regional hubs and combining wealth management and the private bank to drive synergies out of the hubs.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Citi still lags peers on profitability (both ROA and ROTCE); CEO Fraser adopted the profitability gap as a key focus point as well, and we see Fraser’s strategic moves (e.g. int’l consumer exits, headcount reduction in management layers) as aimed at capital and expense optimization to improve ROE with some progress showing up recently.
Citi has had some regulatory mishaps in recent years but has made progress towards resolving issues.
Citi’s global footprint makes it more exposed to emerging markets and non-domestic economies; in the near-term, that could create earnings and capital volatility, though tariff-related disruptions did not ultimately negatively impact Citi in 2025.
Key Metric
AS OF 29 Dec 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROAE (annual) | 10.9% | 7.5% | 4.5% | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| ROAA (annual) | 0.92% | 0.61% | 0.38% | 0.51% | 0.55% |
| PPNR / Avg. Assets | 1.02% | 0.97% | 3.93% | 3.56% | 4.38% |
| Efficiency Ratio | 68% | 67% | 272% | 283% | 259% |
| Net Interest Margin (Annual) | 1.94% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 2.29% | 2.34% |
| Net charge-offs (LTM) / Loans | 0.70% | 0.55% | 0.95% | 1.29% | 1.27% |
| Common Dividend Payout | 19% | 27% | 130% | 187% | 125% |
| CET1 Ratio | 12.3% | 13.0% | 13.4% | 13.6% | 13.3% |
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 5.7% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.9% | 5.5% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) | 115% | 118% | 116% | 117% | 115% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 20 Jan 2026We are moving Citi to Market perform from Underperform, seeing decent spread value at the widest name among Big 6 GSIBs, particularly considering the context of improved profitability as well as progress on divesting itself of Banamex, the most significant step remaining in right-sizing its international exposure. We no longer see policy (i.e. tariffs) as a particular concern for Citi. Additionally we see possible technical tailwinds from lower supply as debt requirements notch downwards due to the eSLR changes that went through in late 2025.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 20, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 13, 2026
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 29 Dec 2025JPMorgan is one of the strongest and best positioned banks to navigate the current environment, with a well-diversified business model and good competitive positioning across a variety of lending and capital markets areas.
The company continues to deploy its considerable earnings power into reinvestment, specifically around technology where we are bullish on its ability to drive competitive advantages through strategic enhancements and efficiency gains.
Business Description
AS OF 29 Dec 2025- JPMorgan ranks as the largest U.S. bank by total assets ($4.56 tn at 3Q25) and deposits ($2.55 tn at 3Q25).
- JPMorgan ranks 1st in terms of U.S. deposits with approximately $2.08 tn in deposits at YE24 across 4,970 branches (S&P Capital IQ). JPMorgan's footprint includes New York (#1), Texas (#1), California (#2), Illinois (#1), Michigan (#1), Arizona (#1), Ohio (#5), and Florida (#4), among others.
- JPMorgan's major business lines include investment banking, retail banking, card services, treasury & securities services, commercial banking, and asset & wealth management.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 29 Dec 2025Succession planning at JPMorgan has a higher profile than many peers, with CEO Dimon (68 year-old) having held the top spot for over 15 years. Another recent round of shuffling top management yielded a little clarity.
The sector is always exposed to reputational, legislative, administration, and economic risk factors. That said, JPM’s strong capital position and scale leaves it well positioned to adapt to evolving landscapes and macro conditions.
Although not likely a credit risk, JPMorgan may continue to be acquisitive around non-bank financial and ancillary services; but we would expect any deal to be conservatively funded and looking to further technology and fee income strategies (e.g. payments or asset management).
Key Metric
AS OF 29 Dec 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROAE (annual) | 17.0% | 13.2% | 16.0% | 17.4% | 16.7% |
| ROAA (annual) | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| PPNR / Avg. Assets | 1.32% | 1.39% | 7.06% | 7.71% | 1.86% |
| Efficiency Ratio | 59% | 58% | 214% | 220% | 53% |
| Net Interest Margin (Annual) | 1.63% | 2.00% | 2.70% | 2.63% | 2.52% |
| Net charge-offs (LTM) / Loans | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.68% |
| Common Dividend Payout | 24% | 32% | 101% | 97% | 27% |
| CET1 Ratio | 13.1% | 13.2% | 15.0% | 15.7% | 14.8% |
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 5.4% | 5.6% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 5.8% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) | 110% | 110% | 113% | 113% | 113% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 14 Jan 2026We continue to view JPMorgan as the strongest and most defensive name among the Big 6 issuers, but at recent tight spread levels and considering sound fundamentals across the space, we see relatively better value at Bank of America currently. JPMorgan’s 4Q25 results showed continued solid trends, and guidance looks positive for 2026– net interest income is expected to see moderate growth and investment banking pipelines remain healthy. Profitability remains quite strong with core ROTCE around 20%, and excess capital remains robust.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 14, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 13, 2026
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 19 Dec 2025We continue to have confidence in CEO Andy Jassy and the company’s long-term business for both AWS and Stores. AWS is a $132 bn run-rate business growing at 20% with GAAP operating margins in the 30s%. The 3Q25 results and commentary supports our view that Amazon will be a winner in Generative AI given the breadth of its cloud business, custom silicon (Trainium), and Bedrock service.
While AMZN’s capex has been ramping, along with other hyperscalers, we are encouraged by its debt reduction over the past few years and zero shareholder returns. There are risks related to its ongoing FTC suit although we view a breakup as unlikely. Pro forma for $15 bn issuance and $1.25 bn upcoming maturity, gross lease-adjusted leverage will increase by one tick to 1.0x.
Business Description
AS OF 19 Dec 2025- Amazon is an e-commerce company which sells a wide range of its own products and those of 3rd party sellers. Amazon offers fulfillment services for 3rd party sellers (FBA) and sells cloud computing services (AWS). In 3Q25, 3rd party units were 62% of total paid units, and FBA units are a majority of 3rd party units.
- In LTM 3Q25, NA segment was 60% of sales, International was 22% of sales, and AWS was 18% of sales.
- Amazon disclosed it surpassed 200 mn Prime members in April 2021. The annual membership was increased in February 2022 from $119 to $139 in the US, although fees vary by country. In mid-2019, Amazon Prime began to transition from 2-day to 1-day shipping. Amazon Prime also offers Prime Video, streaming music, and other benefits.
- In 2006, Amazon launched AWS which remains the leader in cloud computing (IaaS/PaaS). Amazon sells its own devices (e-reader, smart speaker, streaming media player, etc.).
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 19 Dec 2025We think Amazon has moderate event risk given its large size (~$2.4 tn market cap).
Amazon’s capex has been ramping for AI cloud infrastructure, which could lead to more jumbo bond deals in 2026.
In September 2023, the FTC and a consortium of states filed a lawsuit against Amazon and accused the company of (1) punishing sellers for offering lower prices elsewhere and (2) making Prime eligibility conditional on usage of fulfillment services. Motions for summary judgment are not due until August 2026 with a trial scheduled for February 2027. The biggest risk would be a breakup, although we view that as unlikely.
Amazon’s $14 bn acquisition of Whole Foods has shown its proclivity for large M&A.
Key Metric
AS OF 19 Dec 2025| $ mn | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue YoY % | 37.6% | 21.7% | 9.4% | 11.8% | 11.0% | 11.5% |
| EBITDA | 57,284 | 71,994 | 74,593 | 110,305 | 144,162 | 161,740 |
| EBITDA Margin | 14.8% | 15.3% | 14.5% | 19.2% | 22.6% | 23.4% |
| CapEx % of Sales | 12.1% | 13.3% | 11.5% | 8.5% | 12.3% | 17.1% |
| Sh. Ret. % of CFO-CapEx | 0% | 0% | n/m | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Net Debt | (50,497) | (44,453) | 8,516 | (19,451) | (43,051) | (38,880) |
| Gross Leverage | 0.6x | 0.7x | 1.1x | 0.6x | 0.4x | 0.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.3x | 23.3x | 11.7x | 14.4x | 16.1x | 14.5x |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 17 Nov 2025We continue to have confidence in CEO Andy Jassy and the long-term business for AWS and Stores. AWS is a $132 bn run-rate business growing at 20% with GAAP OM% in the 30s%. The 3Q25 results and commentary supports our view that Amazon will be a winner in Generative AI given the breadth of its cloud business, custom silicon (Trainium), and Bedrock service. While AMZN’s capex has been ramping, along with other hyperscalers, we are encouraged by its debt reduction over the past few years and zero shareholder returns. There are risks related to its ongoing FTC suit (not the one that was recently settled on Prime subscriptions) although we view a breakup as unlikely. Pro forma for $15 bn issuance and $1.25 bn upcoming maturity, gross lease-adjusted leverage will increase by one tick to 1.0x.
Recommendation Reviewed: November 17, 2025
Recommendation Changed: May 01, 2024
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 11 Dec 2025SBUX operates and licenses Starbucks cafe locations. The company is current midway through a restaurant revamp aimed at boosting traffic following weak results in 2024. The program aims at improving the in-store coffee shop experience by investing in labor and reducing the prioritization of takeaway.
The turnaround program has a large labor investment component that is weighing on margins. The company has a strong cash flow cushion and management has committed to high-BBB ratings, but leverage has crept to levels above the ratings range.
A JV deal with Boyu Capital, a Chinese private equity firm, is aimed to turn operations around in a struggling Chinese market, by both improving in-store experience and local relevance, and by expanding locations.
Business Description
AS OF 11 Dec 2025- SBUX is a leading coffee roaster and retailer. The company operates and licenses over 40,000 Starbucks locations worldwide where it sells premium coffee beverages as well as other specialty drinks and prepared foods. Slightly over half the locations are company operated (52%) and the rest are licensed to third party operators.
- In F2025, SBUX generated $37.2 bn in revenue and $5.5 bn in adjusted EBITDA. SBUX has three reporting segments: N. America (74% of F2024 revenue), which covers cafes in the U.S. and Canada; International (21%), which includes China, Japan, Latin America, and EMEA; and Channel Development (5.0%) which includes revenue from other branded products sold outside retail locations through partnerships with large consumer companies such as Nestle and PepsiCo.
- On a geographic basis, SBUX's two largest regions are the U.S. (47% of cafes), and China (37%).
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 11 Dec 2025SBUX entered an agreement to form a JV with Boyu Capital to operate the company’s retail coffee business in China. The deal is expected to finalize in F2Q26, and the company did not explicitly state where proceeds would be allocated.
In response to the activist attacks, SBUX announced an unexpected change in CEO and hired Brian Niccol, a veteran of the quick service restaurant industry with a successful track record at Taco Bell and Chipotle.
Lower discretionary spending in the U.S. could continue to weigh on SBUX’s sales outlook. We view its premium-priced beverage offerings as having significant risk of consumer trade down into more value-oriented options.
Investments behind the company’s new store imaging have increased costs and weighed on margins, in large part due to significant investments in labor.
Key Metric
AS OF 11 Dec 2025| $ mn | Y21 | Y22 | Y23 | Y24 | LTM 4Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 29,061 | 32,250 | 35,976 | 36,176 | 37,184 |
| EBITDA | 6,775 | 6,385 | 7,252 | 7,001 | 5,463 |
| EBITDA Margin | 23.3% | 19.8% | 20.2% | 19.4% | 14.7% |
| EBITDA-Capex to Revenue | 18.3% | 14.1% | 13.7% | 11.7% | 8.5% |
| Total Debt | 14,616 | 15,044 | 15,400 | 15,568 | 16,075 |
| Net Debt | 8,160 | 12,226 | 11,848 | 12,282 | 12,855 |
| Net Leverage | 1.2x | 1.9x | 1.6x | 1.8x | 2.4x |
| Lease Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR | 2.9x | 3.1x | 2.8x | 3.0x | 3.7x |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.4x | 17.1x | 16.1x | 17.6x | 20.0x |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 16 Jan 2026SBUX is in the early phases of an operational turnaround plan intent on reigniting foot traffic by improving the in-store experience. The “Back to Starbucks” program has come at the expense of margin due to heavy investments in labor. While the plan is ultimately to increase transactions and tickets due to improved experiences, we are skeptical that the company will be able to recoup the margin. Also, the strategy comes at a time when economic uncertainty could weigh on discretionary purchases. Management has committed to high-BBB ratings, but the margin compression is driving leverage creep. We recommend a wait and see approach to the name and favor McDonald’s bonds in the meanwhile.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 16, 2026
Recommendation Changed: May 01, 2024
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 24 Nov 2025We expect T-Mobile will maintain its position as the industry leader in postpaid phone net additions, service revenue and EBITDA growth in 2025. We think the company has significant subscriber runway remaining in the suburban/rural and enterprise markets.
Adjusted net leverage (2.5x at 3Q25) is below AT&T/Verizon. Relatively strong EBITDA growth and a modest dividend commitment results in greater financial flexibility than peers.
T-Mobile benefits from the strongest spectrum position in the industry, including an average of 181 MHz in the 2.5 GHz band, which results in better 5G network coverage than AT&T and Verizon.
Business Description
AS OF 24 Nov 2025- TMUS is the one of the top 3 U.S. wireless carriers and is owned ~51% by Deutsche Telekom (DT). On April 1, 2020, TMUS and S completed an all-stock merger, valuing S at an EV of approximately $59.7 bn.
- TMUS ended 2024 with ~130 mn customers, including 104 mn postpaid and 25 mn prepaid.
- TMUS reaches 330+mn POPs with its Extended Range 5G network (using the 600 MHz spectrum) and reaches 300mn customers with its Ultra Capacity 5G.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 24 Nov 2025Converged wireless/broadband offers from cable operators raises the risk of pricing pressure in the mature consumer wireless market. AT&T and Verizon have also made sizable fiber acquisitions, enhancing their ability to offer converged services.
The company has not shied away from acquisitions. T-Mobile recently acquired Mint Mobile, two FTTH JVs and US Cellular. So far, M&A has not had much impact on T-Mobile’s credit metrics, but further moves into FTTH may be received poorly by investors.
Key Metric
AS OF 24 Nov 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 80,118 | 79,571 | 78,558 | 81,400 | 85,847 |
| Organic Revenue Growth | 7.3% | (0.7%) | (1.3%) | 3.6% | 7.3% |
| EBITDA | 26,924 | 27,821 | 29,428 | 31,864 | 33,406 |
| Adj. EBITDA Growth | (64.0%) | 33.9% | 5.8% | 8.3% | 7.2% |
| Adj. EBITDA Margin | 33.6% | 35.0% | 37.5% | 39.1% | 38.9% |
| CapEx % of Sales | 15.4% | 17.6% | 12.5% | 10.9% | 11.3% |
| Total Debt | 79,574 | 78,425 | 83,586 | 84,255 | 90,107 |
| Net Debt | 72,943 | 73,918 | 78,451 | 78,846 | 86,797 |
| Gross Leverage | 3.4x | 3.0x | 2.9x | 2.7x | 2.7x |
| Net Leverage | 3.0x | 2.7x | 2.6x | 2.4x | 2.5x |
| Interest Coverage | 7.2x | 8.0x | 8.3x | 8.7x | 8.7x |
| FCF as % of Debt | 13.7% | 13.2% | 19.2% | 23.0% | 22.1% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 08 Jan 2026We expect T-Mobile will maintain its impressive combination of industry leading subscriber and HSD EBITDA growth into 2026 and beyond. T-Mobile also boasts the lowest leverage (~2.5x) and strongest FCF/debt ratio amongst the Wireless Big 3, while its rising FCF generation and comparatively low dividend commitment provide flexibility for selective M&A. We acknowledge that event risk for TMUS is higher than peers AT&T and Verizon, which have already announced material FTTH and spectrum acquisitions. However, despite the rising focus on convergence, we believe TMUS will stick with its off-balance sheet strategy for FTTH JVs and view the risk of a transformational broadband acquisition (ILEC or cable) as low.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 08, 2026
Recommendation Changed: March 18, 2021
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 28 Oct 2025- Netflix is one of the few clear winners in the industry’s transition to streaming, and we believe the group’s leading position will be bolstered in 2025/2026 as legacy media companies continue to rein in spending and international ambitions.
- From a financial perspective, we expect Netflix will deliver ~25% EBITDA growth in 2025 driven by a mix of subscriber growth, price hikes and margin expansion.
- Netflix’s financial policy is relatively conservative. While the company no longer targets $10-15 billion of gross debt, we view Netflix’s new financial policy as an evolution rather than a revolution and expect credit metrics to remain best in class.
Business Description
AS OF 28 Oct 2025- NFLX is the world's leading subscription streaming entertainment service with ~300+ mn paid streaming subs in 190+ countries around the world. NFLX's programming includes original & acquired TV series, documentaries and feature films.
- NFLX began expanding internationally with the launch of services in Canada (Sep 2010), followed by LatAm (Sep 2011), and the UK and Ireland (Jan 2012). NFLX launched services in 17 more markets at a measured pace through the end of 2015 before launching in the rest of the world in Jan 2016 (ex-China, N Korea, Syria, Crimea).
- As of FY24, Netflix's regional subscriber breakdown was as follows: (1) EMEA - 101.1 mn; (2) UCAN - 89.6 mn; (3) APAC - 57.5 mn and (4) LATAM - 53.3 mn.
- Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters are Co-CEOs, with Mr. Sarandos appointed to the position in July 2020 and Mr. Peters in January 2023. Co-founder Reed Hastings was appointed as executive chairman of the Board in January 2023.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 28 Oct 2025- M&A Risk: Warner Bros. Discovery is actively considering asset sales. We believe Netflix has no interest in linear TV assets, but could be open to a studio purchase under the right circumstances. Additionally, Netflix is in the early stages of an expansion into video games and has already acquired several studios.
- Increased Competition: Several large competitors including Amazon and Apple are increasingly leaning into DTC video offerings on a global basis. Heightened competition may result in rising churn & declining gross additions for NFLX.
- Market Saturation: Netflix is highly penetrated in the US market, so future growth will become increasingly dependent on price increases, uptake of the ad tier and success on the password sharing crackdown. The recent WWE and NFL deals also opens the door to higher-priced sports programming.
Key Metric
AS OF 28 Oct 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 29,698 | 31,616 | 33,723 | 39,001 | 43,379 |
| Revenue YoY % | 18.8% | 6.5% | 6.7% | 15.6% | 15.4% |
| EBITDA | 6,806 | 6,695 | 7,650 | 11,019 | 13,265 |
| EBITDA Growth | 33% | (2%) | 14% | 44% | 29% |
| Cash Content Expense | 17,469 | 16,660 | 13,140 | 17,003 | 17,209 |
| CFO - CapEx | (132) | 1,619 | 6,926 | 6,922 | 8,967 |
| Dividends/CFO-Capex | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| LTM CFO-CapEx to Debt | (0.9%) | 11.3% | 47.6% | 44.4% | 62.0% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 22 Jan 2026Netflix is one of the few clear winners in the industry’s transition to streaming, and we believe the group is well positioned to maintain its double-digit top line and profit growth in 2026. Netflix surprised us in early December 2025 with the announcement of an $83 billion deal to acquire Warner Bros. Although the deal marks a major change in strategy and exposes the company to integration/execution risk, we view the transaction as strategically sound and believe that the acquired WB IP/library will further bolster Netflix’s industry-leading position. Despite opposition from Paramount, we see a very high probability that Netflix will receive approval from WBD’ shareholders by April 2026. However, we think the odds of regulatory approval are closer to a coin flip.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 22, 2026
Recommendation Changed: December 04, 2025
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor