DOWNLOAD
Region: Indonesia
Pertamina
- Sector: Energy
- Sub Sector: Oil and Gas
- Region: Indonesia
- Bond: PERTIJ 3.1 30
- Indicative Yield-to-Maturity (YTM): 5.339%
- Credit Rating : -/BBB/-
Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 30 Dec 2024Pertamina enjoys very strong linkages with the Government of Indonesia (GoI) and is assured of extraordinary support in times of distress.
Slightly higher YoY FY24E Brent crude prices could lift upstream margins and overall EBITDA (given the upstream business accounts for >65% of consolidated EBITDA).
Although leverage typically remains low, Pertamina incurs large capex spending that could pressure its free cash flow generation.
High persisting dividend outflows could restrain free cash flow improvements.
Business Description
AS OF 30 Dec 2024- Pertamina is involved in a broad range of upstream and downstream oil, gas, geothermal and petrochemical operations.
- In the upstream sector, it engages in the exploration, development and production and supply of crude oil, natural gas and geothermal energy.
- As for the downstream sector, the company carries out refining, marketing and distribution of oil, gas, fuel products and petrochemical and other non-fuel products.
- As of 31 December 2022, its total proved oil reserves stood at ~1,289 mmbbl (mn barrels of oil) and gas reserves stood at ~817 mmboe (mn barrels of oil equivalent). Its average daily oil and gas production was ~1,044,000 boe per day in FY23. The company owns and operates 6 refineries in Indonesia.
- Under the Public Service Obligation (PSO) mandate, Pertamina is responsible for providing certain grades of motor gasoline, automotive diesel oil, kerosene and LPG at subsidized prices. The subsidized retail price is often times lower than the cost of production, creating a shortfall, for which it receives reimbursements from the GoI.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 30 Dec 2024Pertamina’s profitability is materially affected by volatility in oil & gas prices. Prolonged periods of low oil prices could hurt upstream earnings that form the bulk of overall EBITDA (>65%).
As retail prices of certain fuel products are regulated, realized prices may be below its cost of sales.
Pertamina has to initially absorb the shortfall between the regulated retail price and the cost of producing and distributing certain fuel products. If the price of crude oil exceeds the price ceiling set by the GoI, the company may receive insufficient subsidy reimbursements.
Capex typically remains elevated and which pressurizes its free cash flow generation.
Key Metric
AS OF 30 Dec 2024| $ mn | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 36.2% | 38.5% | 41.2% | 42.1% | 37.6% |
| Net Debt to Book Cap | 22.4% | 18.9% | 21.9% | 12.5% | 8.5% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 56.8% | 62.5% | 70.0% | 72.7% | 60.4% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 26.4% | 28.3% | 29.9% | 30.8% | 27.4% |
| Gross Leverage | 2.2x | 2.4x | 2.5x | 1.9x | 1.9x |
| Net Leverage | 1.3x | 1.2x | 1.3x | 0.6x | 0.4x |
| Interest Coverage | 8.1x | 7.8x | 8.7x | 11.2x | 8.9x |
| EBITDA Margin | 14.9% | 19.9% | 16.0% | 16.7% | 17.7% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 19 Mar 2025We have a Market perform recommendation on Pertamina. Pertamina’s Jan-30/31 bonds trade 22 bp/24 bp wider than Petronas’ 30/32 bonds, while its longer-dated bonds trade an average of 42 bp wider. We see this differential as fair given Petronas’ solid net cash position, larger EBITDA, and stronger financial reporting quality; we believe the wider differential for the longer-dated bonds is attributable to Petronas’ notes trading tight. We remain comfortable with Pertamina’s full state-ownership, timely fuel subsidy and compensation from the Indonesian government, our expectation for Pertamina’s strategic policy role to sustain, positive free cash flow generation, robust credit metrics and adequate liquidity. That said, its capex remains elevated amid a ramp up in energy transition goals.
Recommendation Reviewed: March 19, 2025
Recommendation Changed: May 16, 2023
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Read this content. Log in or sign up.
If you are an investor with us, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you are not yet a client, we can help you by clicking the SIGN UP button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 30 Dec 2024PLN enjoys extremely strong ties with the Government of Indonesia (GoI) given its critical policy role of electrifying the nation.
We see a modestly poorer FY24 credit outlook as resilient domestic power demand, flattish power tariffs and insulation from input cost volatility are offset by sizable capex for coal and renewable capacity additions.
President Prabowo’s plans to tamp down on PLN’s monopoly could induce longer-term regulatory uncertainties.
Business Description
AS OF 30 Dec 2024- PLN is involved in the entire electricity value-chain, from power generation, to transmission, distribution and retail.
- It alone accounts for 76% (~47 GW) of Indonesia's generation capacity (of which 8 GW is renewable capacity), while IPPs provide the remainder.
- The company controls and operates the entire transmission and distribution network in the country. It is the sole buyer of electricity produced by IPPs, through power purchase agreements (PPAs).
- It sells electricity to well-diversified off-takers – 41% to households, 25% to industrial customers, 21% to businesses and 12% to others.
- Since 2015, the GoI has gradually implemented monthly tariff adjustments for 13 customer groups, so that rates charged to customers are better matched with production costs.
- However, under the Public Service Obligation (PSO), the company will continue to sell electricity at subsidized rates of 50% to 450-volt amperes (VA) power households and 25% to 900 VA power households. The GoI subsequently reimburses the company for the difference between the subsidized tariff rate and production cost, typically within 2-3 months.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 30 Dec 2024The company provides subsidized electricity to certain households for which it subsequently receives reimbursements from the GoI; though these payments tend to get delayed during major events such as COVID-19 pandemic.
In order to increase the country’s electrification ratio to 97%, the company had been mandated by the GoI to develop large electricity capacities through the Fast Track II and 35,000 MW Programs. Implementation of such complex programs has required significant capital expenditure, which has led PLN’s FCF to fall deep into the red in recent years and created a funding gap.
The success of the above programs is also contingent on the company’s ability to source coal cheaply, select quality contractors, acquire land rights and receive adequate subsidy reimbursements from the GoI.
Being primarily a thermal power producer, PLN may be viewed unfavourably from an ESG perspective.
Key Metric
AS OF 30 Dec 2024| IDR bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | 1H23 | 1H24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 29.7% | 28.9% | 27.8% | 26.9% | 27.5% |
| Net Debt to Book Cap | 26.9% | 25.2% | 23.7% | 24.6% | 25.4% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 42.2% | 40.7% | 38.5% | 36.7% | 38.0% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 25.7% | 24.6% | 23.4% | 22.6% | 22.9% |
| Gross Leverage | 5.0x | 4.2x | 4.3x | 4.0x | 4.3x |
| Net Leverage | 4.6x | 3.7x | 3.7x | 3.6x | 4.0x |
| Interest Coverage | 3.2x | 4.3x | 3.6x | 3.9x | 3.2x |
| EBITDA Margin | 28.0% | 30.1% | 26.4% | 33.4% | 29.5% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 19 Mar 2025We have a Market perform recommendation on PLN and prefer its 2047-2050s. While we acknowledge PLN’s higher coal-related ESG risk and potential long-term regulatory concern, we remain comfortable with PLN’s resilient credit profile supported by healthy domestic power demand, good insulation from input cost volatility and strong state-ownership. We see fair spread differential of 20 bp wider than Pertamina; we think PLN’s shorter-dated trade close to fair. Against its own curve, PLN’s 2047-2050 trade on average 56 bp wider than its 2030s; similarly rated Indonesian state-owned O&G Pertamina on the other hand sees an average spread differential of 42 bp across its longer-dated versus its own 2030. We thus see scope for PLN’s long-end to tighten another ~15 bp.
Recommendation Reviewed: March 19, 2025
Recommendation Changed: December 06, 2024