DOWNLOAD
Archives: CreditSights Issuer List
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 12 Nov 2025Historically, KDP has benefited from exposure to faster growing, higher margin beverage & coffee categories. However, the credit story is current dominated by the pending acquisition of JDE Peet’s, and plans to separate the coffee and beverage businesses.
Pro forma for the initial merger, KDP will have net leverage of 4.6x (vs 3.3x at MRQ), with plans to delever thereafter. Management expects both standalone entities to maintain investment grade ratings, but leverage will likely be elevated out of the gate.
KDP has a successful track record of deleveraging after past M&A. We like the growth outlooks of the proposed standalone entities, and think the new issue to fund the acquisition will likely present a good opportunity to add exposure to the name.
Business Description
AS OF 12 Nov 2025- KDP is the result of a July 2018 merger between Dr Pepper Snapple and Keurig Green Mountain. The merger combined a traditional soft drinks company (DPS) with a faster growing coffee platform that includes the market's leading single serve brewing system.
- The merger was backed by JAB Holdings via its affiliate, Maple Holdings BV. While JAB has trimmed its stake in recent periods, it still controls ~16% of the shares.
- KDP recorded $15.4 bn in 2024 net sales with adjusted EBITDA of $4.5 bn. The business is heavily concentrated in North America, and results are reported across three operating segments: U.S. Refreshment Beverages (61% of 2024 sales), U.S. Coffee (26% of sales), and International (13.0% of sales).
- Examples of KDP's key brands include Dr Pepper, Keurig, Snapple, Canada Dry, 7Up, Mott's, and A&W. The company also partners with other leading coffee brands from various producers via licensing and manufacturing agreements for K-cups.
- KDP signed a definitive agreement to acquire JDE Peet's for $22+ bn in August. The deal is expected to close in 1H26. Subsequently the company intends to separate the business into two standalone entities: Global Coffee Co and Beverage Co.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 12 Nov 2025The KDP-JDEP acquisition ($22 bn) is anticipated to close in 1H26, with the goal of being separation ready by year-end 2026. Management reiterated its $400 mn synergy target over three years.
The coffee industry is currently experiencing intense cost inflation, and price elasticity has increased, challenging cost passthrough.
Post-split, BeverageCo will target 3.5-4.0x net leverage and Global CoffeeCo will target 3.75-4.25x net leverage. There is still uncertainty where legacy bonds will end up, but we tend to see BeverageCo ending up as RemainCo. It is also unclear what pf net leverage will be at the standalone entities. If BeverageCo is RemainCo, we expect some level of debt repayment following a spin/sale of Global CoffeeCo.
Key Metric
AS OF 12 Nov 2025| $ mn | Y21 | Y22 | Y23 | Y24 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12,683 | 14,057 | 14,814 | 15,351 | 16,174 |
| EBITDA | 3,908 | 3,932 | 4,189 | 4,528 | 4,678 |
| EBITDA Margin | 30.8% | 28.0% | 28.3% | 29.5% | 28.9% |
| EBITDA-CAPEX-INT % of Revenues | 23.5% | 20.5% | 21.7% | 21.6% | 21.7% |
| Total Debt | 12,024 | 12,104 | 13,308 | 15,595 | 15,846 |
| Net Debt | 11,457 | 11,569 | 13,041 | 15,085 | 15,330 |
| Net Leverage | 2.9x | 2.9x | 3.1x | 3.3x | 3.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.3x | 15.8x | 14.2x | 13.0x | 10.7x |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 24 Feb 2026We see value in KDP spreads relative to mid-BBB beverage peer Constellation Brands, and relative to tighter trading names like General Mills and Mondelez, even as the company contemplates the leveraging acquisition of JDE Peet’s and a subsequent split of its coffee and beverage businesses. PF net leverage is expected to be 4.5x out of the gate and management will target investment grade levels are both entities after the eventual spin. Financing will include $8.5 bn of private equity funds, which was designed to replace debt financing and aid in deleveraging. We are comfortable with the anticipated credit profiles of the two supposed standalone entities, and favor the beverage and coffee margin and cash flow profiles to those of food peers
Recommendation Reviewed: February 24, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 16, 2026
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 10 Nov 2025As one of the world’s largest beverage companies KO operates across a diverse geographic footprint and generates stable and robust free cash flow.
KO’s net leverage is in a conservative position despite a recent increase in debt, at the low-end of management’s 2.0-2.5x range.
In light of recent increase price elasticity in food categories, we favor KO’s pure-play beverage portfolio to mixed food and beverage portfolio at PepsiCo.
Business Description
AS OF 10 Nov 2025- KO is the world's largest beverage company, owning, licensing, and marketing numerous brands in over 200 countries worldwide. It has 4 of the world's top 5 nonalcoholic sparkling beverage brands: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta and Sprite.
- KO distributes its product through independent and company-controlled bottling distribution operations. KO largely refranchised its wholly-owned bottlers, selling the operations to independent bottlers. This strategy reduced capital intensity and expanded margins.
- KO has two primary businesses: Beverage Concentrates (66% of revenue) and Finished Sparkling & Still Beverages (34% of revenue). KO uses unit case volume growth and concentrate sales volume to evaluate performance.
- In 2024, the Coca-Cola system sold 33.7 bn unit cases of products worldwide, comprised of 69% from sparkling beverages and 47% from trademark Coca-Cola. The system has broad international exposure, with 84% of unit case volume generated outside the U.S.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 10 Nov 2025An unfavorable U.S. tax ruling could still result in some leverage creep depending on the ultimate outcome. KO is appealing the ruling, and in the meantime, management’s has steered leverage towards or below the low-end of its 2-2.5x range.
Management has expressed interest in expanding its presence over time in the alcoholic beverage category, although to this point the company has limited its involvement to licensing arrangements for its soft drink brands with large-scale brewers and distillers.
Sugar-based drinks have frequently been the target of RFK Jr’s MAHA movement, introducing risk of SNAP eligibility loss, which could create demand headwinds.
Key Metric
AS OF 10 Nov 2025| $ mn | Y21 | Y22 | Y23 | Y24 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 38,658 | 43,046 | 45,784 | 46,897 | 47,475 |
| EBITDA | 12,898 | 13,961 | 14,719 | 15,446 | 16,122 |
| EBITDA Margin | 33.4% | 32.4% | 32.1% | 32.9% | 34.0% |
| EBITDA-CAPEX-INT % of Revenues | 27.9% | 26.9% | 24.8% | 25.0% | 26.2% |
| Total Debt | 42,761 | 39,149 | 42,064 | 44,522 | 47,416 |
| Net Debt | 31,835 | 28,587 | 29,701 | 31,674 | 33,542 |
| Net Leverage | 2.5x | 2.0x | 2.0x | 2.1x | 2.1x |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.4x | 21.8x | 19.4x | 19.5x | 19.8x |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 18 Feb 2026We have an Outperform recommendation on KO bonds, reflecting a slight preference for the credit over its high-A beverage peer, PepsiCo, at similar levels. We view both credits as core holds, but our updated view reflects increased comfort with KO’s ability to navigate an expected tax liabilities related to U.S. Tax Court litigation, as well as recent earnout payments related to the Fairlife acquisition. KO has reported steady organic growth led by continued pricing benefits and stable consumption trends across its portfolio of soft drinks. Management guides to a net leverage target of 2-2.5x and we expect the company to maintain metrics in that range over the medium term. Playing KO vs PEP also allows investors to avoid activist risk and exposure to the snacking category at PEP.
Recommendation Reviewed: February 18, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 16, 2025
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.BDO Unibank
- Sector: Financial Services
- Sub Sector: Banks
- Country: Philippines
- Bond: BDOPM 4.375 30
- Indicative Yield-to-Maturity (YTM): 4.26%
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 07 Nov 2025- BDO Unibank (BDO) is the largest bank in the Philippines in terms of assets & market share.
- Given its size and systemic importance, BDO is considered too big to fail and is strongly likely to be supported by its controlling shareholder SM Investments, as well as the Philippine government in times of stress.
- BDO is widely viewed as the soundest bank in the country given its strong fundamentals, well-diversified businesses, and good management.
Business Description
AS OF 07 Nov 2025- BDO Unibank was established as Acme Savings Bank in 1968, and was then acquired by SM Investments in 1976. It became a commercial bank in 1994 and a universal bank in 1996.
- BDO was listed in May 2002. SM Investments remains the bank's largest shareholder with a 41% stake.
- BDO has expanded through a series of M&As. Among its key transactions, it merged with Dao Heng Bank Philippines in 2001, Banco Santander Philippines in 2003, UOB Philippines in 2005, Equitable PCI Bank in 2007, GE Money Bank in 2009, Citibank Savings, DB Trust and Real Bank in 2014, One Network Bank in 2015 (the largest rural bank in the Philippines), and RB Pandi's banking business in 2019. It also acquired the insurance business of Generali in the Philippines in 2016.
- BDO has the largest distribution network in the country and is ranked the largest bank in terms of consolidated resources, total assets, loans, deposits and trust funds under management.
- Its loan book was split 51% large corporates, 24% middle market, and 25% consumer at 2Q25. 41% of the consumer book comprised mortgages, 29% credit cards, 13% auto loans and the remaining personal loans (13%) and others (5%).
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 07 Nov 2025- Direct impact from US tariffs is limited given that the Philippines is not a major goods exporter, but there is likely to be some second order effects from a slowdown in regional and global growth.
- We anticipate a negative impact to loan and GDP growth from the recent public infrastructure spending corruption scandal, which will slow government spending and private investments for the next couple of quarters. Further BSP rate cuts are likely in order to support growth, which will put downward pressure on the NIM.
- We see few asset quality risks for BDO given a comfortable NPL cover (3Q25: 134%) and build up of the CET1 ratio (3Q25: 14.4%), as well as BDO’s large corporates book (~50% of total loans) and underwriting track record.
- Any rating downgrade of the Philippine sovereign would negatively impact BDO.
Key Metric
AS OF 07 Nov 2025| PHP mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 9M25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIM | 4.05% | 4.14% | 4.37% | 4.35% | 4.29% |
| Reported ROA (Cumulative) | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Reported ROE (Cumulative) | 10.4% | 13.0% | 15.2% | 15.1% | 14.1% |
| Equity/Assets | 11.7% | 11.3% | 11.5% | 11.8% | 11.9% |
| CET1 Ratio | 13.6% | 13.4% | 13.8% | 14.1% | 14.4% |
| NPL ratio | 2.8% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Provisions/Loans | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.44% |
| PPP ROA | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio | 145% | 141% | 123% | 132% | 143% |
| Net Stable Funding Ratio | 124% | 124% | 124% | 122% | n/m |
CreditSights View
AS OF 07 Jan 2026BDO Unibank (BDO) is the largest bank in the Philippines by assets and market share, regarded as the country’s most sound financial institution due to its strong fundamentals, diversified businesses, and effective management. Its systemic importance makes it highly likely to receive support from SM Investments (its major shareholder) and the government during stress periods. While direct exposure to US tariffs is minimal, BDO faces risks from slower regional growth and domestic challenges such as the recent infrastructure spending corruption scandal, which may dampen loan and GDP growth. Further BSP rate cuts to stimulate the economy could pressure net interest margins, but asset quality remains robust with a high NPL cover (134%) and CET1 ratio of 14.4%. The bank’s loan portfolio is dominated by large corporates (~51%), supported by a strong underwriting track record. Any downgrade of the Philippine sovereign rating could negatively affect BDO. Its extensive M&A history and largest distribution network reinforce its leadership position in the market.
Recommendation Reviewed: January 07, 2026
Recommendation Changed: January 07, 2026
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Netflix Inc
- Sector: Media
- Sub Sector: Technology
- Region: US
- Bond: NFLX 4.875 30
- Indicative Yield-to-Maturity (YTM): 4.30%
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 28 Oct 2025- Netflix is one of the few clear winners in the industry’s transition to streaming, and we believe the group’s leading position will be bolstered in 2025/2026 as legacy media companies continue to rein in spending and international ambitions.
- From a financial perspective, we expect Netflix will deliver ~25% EBITDA growth in 2025 driven by a mix of subscriber growth, price hikes and margin expansion.
- Netflix’s financial policy is relatively conservative. While the company no longer targets $10-15 billion of gross debt, we view Netflix’s new financial policy as an evolution rather than a revolution and expect credit metrics to remain best in class.
Business Description
AS OF 28 Oct 2025- NFLX is the world's leading subscription streaming entertainment service with ~300+ mn paid streaming subs in 190+ countries around the world. NFLX's programming includes original & acquired TV series, documentaries and feature films.
- NFLX began expanding internationally with the launch of services in Canada (Sep 2010), followed by LatAm (Sep 2011), and the UK and Ireland (Jan 2012). NFLX launched services in 17 more markets at a measured pace through the end of 2015 before launching in the rest of the world in Jan 2016 (ex-China, N Korea, Syria, Crimea).
- As of FY24, Netflix's regional subscriber breakdown was as follows: (1) EMEA - 101.1 mn; (2) UCAN - 89.6 mn; (3) APAC - 57.5 mn and (4) LATAM - 53.3 mn.
- Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters are Co-CEOs, with Mr. Sarandos appointed to the position in July 2020 and Mr. Peters in January 2023. Co-founder Reed Hastings was appointed as executive chairman of the Board in January 2023.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 28 Oct 2025- M&A Risk: Warner Bros. Discovery is actively considering asset sales. We believe Netflix has no interest in linear TV assets, but could be open to a studio purchase under the right circumstances. Additionally, Netflix is in the early stages of an expansion into video games and has already acquired several studios.
- Increased Competition: Several large competitors including Amazon and Apple are increasingly leaning into DTC video offerings on a global basis. Heightened competition may result in rising churn & declining gross additions for NFLX.
- Market Saturation: Netflix is highly penetrated in the US market, so future growth will become increasingly dependent on price increases, uptake of the ad tier and success on the password sharing crackdown. The recent WWE and NFL deals also opens the door to higher-priced sports programming.
Key Metric
AS OF 28 Oct 2025| $ mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 3Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 29,698 | 31,616 | 33,723 | 39,001 | 43,379 |
| Revenue YoY % | 18.8% | 6.5% | 6.7% | 15.6% | 15.4% |
| EBITDA | 6,806 | 6,695 | 7,650 | 11,019 | 13,265 |
| EBITDA Growth | 33% | (2%) | 14% | 44% | 29% |
| Cash Content Expense | 17,469 | 16,660 | 13,140 | 17,003 | 17,209 |
| CFO - CapEx | (132) | 1,619 | 6,926 | 6,922 | 8,967 |
| Dividends/CFO-Capex | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| LTM CFO-CapEx to Debt | (0.9%) | 11.3% | 47.6% | 44.4% | 62.0% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 10 Feb 2026Netflix is one of the few clear winners in the industry’s transition to streaming, and we believe the group is well positioned to maintain its double-digit top line and profit growth in 2026. Netflix surprised us in early December 2025 with the announcement of an $83 billion deal to acquire Warner Bros. Although the deal marks a major change in strategy and exposes the company to integration/execution risk, we view the transaction as strategically sound and believe that the acquired WB IP/library will further bolster Netflix’s industry-leading position. Despite opposition from Paramount, we see a very high probability that Netflix will receive approval from WBD’ shareholders by April 2026. However, we think the odds of regulatory approval are closer to a coin flip.
Recommendation Reviewed: February 10, 2026
Recommendation Changed: December 04, 2025
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Commonwealth Bank of Australia
- Sector: Financial Services
- Sub Sector: Banks
- Region: Australia
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 21 Oct 2025CBA has a very strong franchise in Australia; it is the leader in the retail market and is making good progress in challenging NAB in business banking.
It has been the best managed of the Australian banks for many years, and has outperformed peers. It lost some of its luster in the latter part of the 2010s due to regulatory and compliance lapses amid charges of complacency, but has since improved into a better institution.
Its capital and liquidity position is robust, and asset quality is strong.
Business Description
AS OF 21 Oct 2025- Originally established by the Australian government in 1911, CBA functioned for some time as Australia's central bank until the establishment of the Reserve Bank of Australia in 1959. It remained under government ownership until the early 1990s, after which it underwent a transformation from a bureaucratic public sector bank into a widely respected commercial organisation.
- Over the past couple of decades, CBA consolidated its position as the leading bank in Australia with a 24-28% share in household deposits and lending, helped by its acquisition of Bank of Western Australia during the 2008 crisis.
- In New Zealand it owns ASB Bank, but otherwise has been selling non-core assets, including its life insurance business.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 21 Oct 2025CBA’s financial health is closely linked to the Australian economy, in particular retail credit quality, mainly housing loans. Household confidence is improving, but they continue to be stretched; discretionary consumer spend is improving though on growth in real disposable incomes. Unemployment continues to be comfortable.
Earnings/NIMs are under pressure from strong mortgage market and deposit competition. Business banking growth however has been stellar and highly profitable.
The interest rate cuts coming through from the RBA will improve borrowers’ ability to make interest payments.
Key Metric
AS OF 21 Oct 2025| AUD mn | Y22 | Y23 | Y24 | Y25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity | 12.7% | 14.0% | 13.6% | 13.5% |
| Total Revenues Margin | 2.1% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Cost/Income | 46.3% | 43.7% | 45.0% | 45.7% |
| APRA CET1 Ratio | 11.5% | 12.2% | 12.3% | 12.3% |
| International CET1 Ratio | 18.6% | 19.1% | 19.1% | 20.9% |
| APRA Leverage Ratio | 5.2% | 5.1% | 5.0% | 4.7% |
| Impairment Charge/Avg Loans | (0.0%) | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Gross Impaired Loans/Total Loans | n/m | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio | 130% | 131% | 136% | 130% |
| Net Stable Funding Ratio | 130% | 124% | 116% | 115% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 11 Feb 2026CBA operates as a well-oiled machine in the Australian banking market and is our preferred name in the space. It has the leading position in mortgages and deposits, and is challenging NAB in business banking. An AUSTRAC penalty in 2018 damaged its reputation and remediation costs impacted earnings for a couple of years. The bank sold a number of its non-bank business and equity investments to simplify and focus on its core domestic businesses. It has the highest NIM amongst the Aussie banks. Business banking growth has been stellar and highly profitable. Asset quality is comfortable. Its seniors trade tight but at an acceptable level, while its Tier 2s trade fair. It had a recent dip in performance in 1Q26 but 2Q26 was strong.
Recommendation Reviewed: February 11, 2026
Recommendation Changed: October 05, 2016
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Alibaba
- Sector: Technology Media and Telecommunications
- Sub Sector: Technology
- Country: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 15 Sep 2025We maintain our O/P recommendation on BABA post its decent F1Q26 results; topline growth missed expectations, EBITDA margin fell 1 ppt, and FOCF turned negative; that said, gross leverage remained modest, with a strong net cash position intact. We view BABA as a core holding in China/Asia IG credits, and it is our preferred duration play. Its longer duration bonds trade ~40 bp wider than Chinese SOEs of similar tenors. In particular, we like BABA 2035. Within China tech credits, we prefer BABA over BIDU/JD, which are rated 1-2 notches lower but trade only marginally wider. We also view BABA to be more defensive compared to high beta BBB China tech credits while offering value.
Business Description
AS OF 15 Sep 2025- Founded in 1999, Alibaba is the largest retail commerce company in the world based on gross merchandise volume (GMV) as of 31 March 2023.
- The company's business segments comprise Taobao & Tmall Group (39% of F4Q25 revenue; China e-commerce incl. Taobao, Tmall, Taobao Deals, Taocaicai, 1688.com), International Digital Commerce (13%; incl. Lazada, AliExpress, Trendyol and Daraz), Cloud Intelligence Group (11%; incl. AliCloud, AI), logistic provider Cainiao (8%), Local Consumer Services (6%; incl. Ele.me, Amap), and Digital Media and Entertainment (2%, incl. Youku & Alibaba Pictures) and Others (21%; incl. Freshippo, Fliggy, Alibaba Health, Intelligent Information Platform, SunArt, DingTalk).
- Taobao/Tmall is Alibaba's core business and the main EBITA & cash generation unit of the group. Alibaba's annual active consumer exceeded 1 bn in June-2022.
- Alibaba had a market capitalization of RMB 2.7 tn as of 15 September 2025.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 15 Sep 2025While Chinese policymakers have adopted an increasingly friendly stance towards tech platforms, regulatory clampdown (e.g. anti-monopoly guidelines, data security laws, personal information protection laws) may still affect Alibaba as it increases compliance cost. There are regulatory risks given the corporate structure which uses variable interest entities (VIEs) to circumvent China’s restrictions on foreign ownership of Internet Content Providers (ICPs).
Intensifying competition amongst eCommerce platforms may result in slower topline growth and weaker EBITDA margins.
Alibaba does not control Alipay but relies on Alipay to conduct substantially all the payment processing and escrow services on its marketplaces.
US-China tension may escalate under the new Trump Administration, including additional chip sanctions, which may result in higher volatility. Failing to secure a stable supply of advanced AI chips and/(or) find domestic alternatives could weigh on the long-term AI development of Alibaba against international peers.
Key Metric
AS OF 15 Sep 2025| CNY BN | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | LTM F1Q26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 11.6% | 12.6% | 13.3% | 17.5% | 17.5% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 13.1% | 14.4% | 15.3% | 21.2% | 21.2% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 8.3% | 9.2% | 9.7% | 12.8% | 12.6% |
| Gross Leverage | 0.9x | 0.9x | 0.9x | 1.2x | 1.2x |
| Interest Coverage | 32.2x | 29.6x | 24.0x | 20.7x | 19.9x |
| EBITDA Margin | 18.5% | 20.2% | 20.3% | 19.9% | 19.6% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 26 Nov 2025We maintain our O/P recc on Alibaba post its F2Q26 results; topline growth accelerated and was ahead of expectations; but EBITDA margin weakened due to hefty spending to expand its quick commerce segment; FOCF turned negative due to elevated capex for cloud and quick commerce; gross leverage weakened and net cash shrunk; that said, we still expect the company to maintain its net cash position over the next 6 months, and we project for its debt metrics to recover in FY27. We view Alibaba as a core holding in China and Asia IG credits, and it is our preferred duration play. Alibaba now trades on average 10 bp wider than Asia A corporate and 30 bp wider than Chinese SOEs which we view as attractive. We like BABA 5.25% 2035 for 30 bp of spread pick up against Chinese SOEs of similar tenors.
Recommendation Reviewed: November 26, 2025
Recommendation Changed: August 05, 2022
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.China CITIC Financial Asset Management (Huarong)
- Sector: Financial Services
- Sub Sector: Banks
- Region: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 10 Sep 2025A large impairment loss in FY20 brought CITIC AMC (formerly Huarong) to the brink of insolvency, but a state-led rescue plan provided it with liquidity support and brought its capital back above minimum requirements. CITIC has replaced the MoF as its largest shareholder. CITIC AMC remains as one of the Big 5 state-owned AMCs in China and will continue to perform national services.
On the guidance of the authorities, CITIC AMC has divested almost all of its non-core subsidiaries.
We expect its core operations to remain weak and volatile, until China’s economy is back on the upswing, residents regain confidence in the property market, and improved capital markets lead to better valuations on its securities books.
Business Description
AS OF 10 Sep 2025- China CITIC Financial Asset Management (formerly Huarong) is one of the five major state-owned asset management companies in China. It was first set up in 1999 to take over the bad debts of ICBC.
- The AMCs were originally due to be wound up after dealing with these "policy loans" that had come onto the books of the banks under government direction before their commercialisation, but the AMCs found a new role as commercial bad debt managers.
- CITIC AMC was commercialised in 2012 and completed its IPO on the HK stock exchange in 2015. Since then, it expanded its financial services to banking, financial leasing, securities & futures, trust, as well as consumer finance. However, after heavy losses in FY20, the company has divested almost all of its non-core business as directed by the authorities.
- Following the CITIC-led rescue plan and the equity transfer from the Ministry of Finance (MOF) to CITIC, CITIC has become its largest shareholder (26.46%). Other significant shareholders include MOF (24.76%), Zhongbaorongxin (18.08%), Cinda AMC (4.89%), China Life Insurance (4.50%), National Social Security Fund (3.08%), Warburg Pincus (2.57%), and ICBC Financial AM (2.44%). It was renamed to share the "CITIC" brand in Nov-23.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 10 Sep 2025CITIC’s support is strong (name change, investment in CEB and CITIC Ltd, subsidiary disposal, new management team, etc.) and more meaningful to the company compared to direct ownership by the government.
Derisking continues with lower property exposure, non-core businesses have largely been disposed of and the company is able to focus on its main DDA business per the guidance of the authorities.
While the company was able to deliver profit growth on the back of CITIC support and its associate interest holdings, core performance remains weak, and there could be continued volatility in the name.
AMCs may find it harder to dispose DDAs at good valuations amid a deceleration economic cycle. Longer holding periods will dampen return yields.
Key Metric
AS OF 10 Sep 2025| CNY mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1H25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.10% | (2.20%) | 0.02% | 0.75% | 1.10% |
| ROE | 1.0% | (49.8%) | 3.6% | 18.4% | 21.1% |
| Total Capital Ratio | 13.0% | 15.1% | 15.1% | 15.7% | 16.0% |
| Leverage Ratio | 14.2x | 16.1x | 11.5x | 10.1x | 8.6x |
| Equity/Assets | 0.0% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.7% | 4.0% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 02 Sep 2025CITIC AMC (ex-Huarong) continued to book profits 1H25, helped by investments in three listed SOEs. Core businesses remained weak and volatile, as the company continues to lower valuations on existing DDAs acquired many years ago. Its non-DDA financial assets also have a more volatile performance than peers. CITIC’s support is strong, derisking continues with a meaningful improvement in the provision coverage ratio, non-core businesses have all been cleared, and the company is able to focus on main DDA business per the authorities’ guidance. The capital adequacy ratio has improved meaningfully to 16%, surpassing Cinda. Disclosure remains poor. We expect it to trade ~30 bp wider than CCAMCL.
Recommendation Reviewed: September 02, 2025
Recommendation Changed: July 14, 2025
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 03 Sep 2025Petronas’ 1H25 and FY24 credit metrics remained resilient even as EBITDA fell as we had expected.
Despite the lower YoY outlook for O&G price realizations in FY25, we expect Petronas’ credit profile to remain resilient in FY25 and maintain its net cash position, aided by resilient domestic demand and still-positive FCFs.
We take comfort in Petronas’ strong support from the Government of Malaysia, given it is strategically vested with Malaysia’s entire oil & gas resources and provides a substantial source of government income.
Sizable O&G and renewable capex and high dividend payouts could restrain improvements in Petronas’ credit metrics and free cash flows.
Business Description
AS OF 03 Sep 2025- Petronas is an integrated oil and gas company, wholly owned and controlled by the Government of Malaysia.
- Its activities span the entire up/mid/downstream value chain both domestically and internationally. Key products and services provided include the sale and marketing of petroleum products, crude oil and condensates, LNG, natural and processed gas, petrochemicals, shipping services, property development and automotive engineering.
- Petronas carries out its exploration, development and production activities via production sharing contracts (“PSCs”), mostly with international O&G companies and Petronas' wholly-owned subsidiaries.
- Its Downstream segment is aimed at refining, supplying, trading, manufacturing and marketing of crude oil, petroleum products, and petrochemical products. Its key projects and factories include Pengerang Integrated Complex (PIC), Sabah Ammonia Urea in Sabah, and Integrated Aroma Ingredients Complex in Gebeng, Kuantan.
- Its Gas and New Energy division was set up in FY19 and groups all of Petronas' LNG, gas and renewable revenues into a single segment. Activities within this division include production of LNG, processing and transportation of gas and solar power production.
- Its 6 listed subsidiaries include MISC Berhad (57.56%), KLCC Property (75.46%), Petronas Chemicals Group Berhad (64.35%), Petronas Gas Berhad (51%), Petronas Dagangan Berhad (63.94%), and Bintulu Port Holdings Berhad (28.52%).
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 03 Sep 2025Broad growth slowdown concerns could hamper sales of Petronas’ Downstream (petroleum products) and Gas & New Energy (LNG and natural gas) segments.
Prolonged periods of low crude oil prices could harm upstream O&G EBITDA (which typically contributes 50%-70% of total profit after tax), albeit mitigated partly by stronger downstream O&G EBITDA.
Sizable capex on domestic O&G and renewable energy ventures could restrain improvements in Petronas’ credit metrics and free cash flows.
Petronas is regularly required to pay dividends to the Government of Malaysia, which may weigh on its cash flows.
We remain watchful of how the dispute between Petronas and Sarawak state government unfolds, its impact on Petronas’ financials and its market position in the Malaysian O&G sector.
Key Metric
AS OF 03 Sep 2025| MYR mn | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 1H24 | 1H25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 18.4% | 18.2% | 18.0% | 18.6% | 20.0% |
| Net Debt to Book Cap | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m |
| Debt/Total Equity | 22.6% | 22.2% | 21.9% | 22.8% | 25.1% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 14.7% | 14.4% | 14.5% | 14.3% | 15.8% |
| Gross Leverage | 0.6x | 0.8x | 0.9x | 0.8x | 2.1x |
| Net Leverage | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m | n/m |
| Interest Coverage | 33.9x | 24.9x | 21.8x | 24.4x | 18.6x |
| EBITDA Margin | 50.7% | 44.8% | 42.0% | 43.6% | 45.3% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 08 Dec 2025We maintain our M/P rec on Petronas and remove our preference for its 2026-2032 as our anticipated tightening has played out; Petronas’ short-dated have tightened ~30 bp since we first put out our preference. We compare Petronas to Pertamina and think its $ bonds now trade within our fair value range against Pertamina’s. We like Petronas’s larger EBITDA, net cash position, more regular financial reporting than Pertamina and Malaysia’s relative policy stability. With the Petronas vs Sarawak state dispute nearing a resolution, we are more comfortable with the credit though we remain watchful of any negative development should Sarawak further contest the reported agreement.
Recommendation Reviewed: December 08, 2025
Recommendation Changed: September 07, 2020
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Hyundai Motor
- Sector: Manufacturing
- Sub Sector: Automotive
- Country: Korea
- Bond: HYNMTR 5.4 31
- Indicative Yield-to-Maturity (YTM): 4.50%
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 21 Aug 2025- While the profit headwind related to tariffs could become a rating event over time, we expect the rating agencies to maintain their patient stance on Hyundai based on its solid market position and healthy pre-tariff profit margins, giving the company time to implement and execute tariff mitigation strategies before contemplating negative rating actions. We note that Hyundai’s biggest mitigation strategy involving the ramp of its US-based Metaplant is already underway and should reduce its reliance on vehicle imports for the US market from 60% to 30% over time.
Business Description
AS OF 21 Aug 2025- Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. engages in the manufacture and distribution of motor vehicles and parts. It operates through the following business areas: Vehicle, Financial and Other. The Vehicle division offers motor vehicles. The Financial division provides financing, leasing and credit cards. The Other division includes manufacture of railways. The company was founded on December 29, 1967, and is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.
- Hyundai Capital America benefits from a support agreement with Hyundai Motor (HMC). HCA investor relations confirmed its support (keepwell) agreement contains a fixed charge coverage provision that it views as particularly strong compared to other peers.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 21 Aug 2025- On a combined basis, HMG’s current FY25 guidance targets FY25 wholesale unit growth of 2% to 7.4 mn units, revenue growth of 5% to 6%, and a consolidated operating profit margin of 8.8% at the midpoint of the range for YoY margin contraction of 40 bp. Kia management expects 2H25 vehicle demand in the US to decline 10% YoY, which will likely lead to a reduction in HMG’s FY25 wholesale unit target. Hyundai management stated it expects a bigger tariff impact in 3Q25 and 4Q25 than 2Q25, which we believe is likely due to a combination of vehicle tariffs being in effect for the entire quarter instead of just two months in 2Q25, along with lower volumes.
- HMG targets continued growth of NEVs in 2H25, including a target of 100% growth in HEV sales. Given the end of the US $7,500 NEV consumer tax incentive at the end of 3Q25 and expected reduced emissions standards in the US, the company plans to leverage its flexible production system for ICE and NEVs to adapt to potential demand changes. Management previously noted its Metaplant in Georgia, which was originally designed to manufacture EVs, was being retooled to also produce HEVs and could potentially produce ICE vehicles in the future.
Key Metric
AS OF 21 Aug 2025| KRW bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 2Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 94,143 | 113,718 | 130,150 | 136,725 | 141,518 |
| EBIT | 5,459 | 8,950 | 15,440 | 14,189 | 12,233 |
| EBIT Margin | 5.8% | 7.9% | 11.9% | 10.4% | 8.5% |
| EBITDA | 10,015 | 13,998 | 20,387 | 18,476 | 15,331 |
| EBITDA Margin | 10.6% | 12.3% | 15.7% | 13.5% | 8.5% |
| Total Liquidity | 19,745 | 26,639 | 26,507 | 27,488 | 22,776 |
| Net Debt | (5,202) | (11,035) | (10,916) | (11,799) | (17,730) |
| Total Debt | 12,569 | 12,940 | 12,940 | 12,940 | 5,805 |
| Gross Leverage | 1.3x | 0.9x | 0.6x | 0.7x | 0.4x |
| Net Leverage | -0.5x | -0.8x | -0.5x | -0.6x | -1.0x |
CreditSights View
AS OF 10 Feb 2026We reiterate our Market perform recommendation on Hyundai Motor Group (A3/A-/A-; S/S/S) notes based on relative value, the company’s solid global market position, our view that its low-A credit rating should be secure in the near term, its growing new energy vehicle business, tariff mitigation initiatives including vehicle onshoring in the US, and reduced tariff headwinds despite transitory headline risk.
Recommendation Reviewed: February 10, 2026
Recommendation Changed: November 04, 2025
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.JD.com
- Sector: Media and TelecommunicationsTechnology
- Sub Sector: Technology
- Country: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 21 Aug 2025We maintain our M/P recommendation on JD post its weak 2Q25 results; topline growth was a strong beat, but EBITDA margin materially narrowed due to hefty spending for its food delivery business; FOCF also contracted and gross debt metrics weakened, but JD still retained a strong net cash position. JD trades largely in-line to Asia A- corp which we view as fair; while we expect JD’s gross debt metrics to temporarily weaken over 2H25 due to its hefty investments into food delivery, we do not expect downgrade risk for the credit given the strong performance of its core retail and logistic segments, and we expect JD to still maintain a strong net cash position over the 12 months. Amongst the A-rated China tech credits, we continue to prefer Alibaba and Tencent.
Business Description
AS OF 21 Aug 2025- JD is one of China's leading e-commerce and retail infrastructure service providers.
- JD has a large fulfillment infrastructure which includes over 1,600 warehouses operated by the company, and 2,000 cloud warehouses operated by third-party warehouse owner-operators under JD Logistics Open Warehouse Platform. Its warehouse network had an aggregate gross floor area of approximately over 32 mn square meters, as of 31 December 2024.
- JD has 3 operating segments, namely (1) JD Retail (82% of 2Q25 revenues), which includes JD Health and JD Industrials, and the segment mainly engages in online retail, online marketplace and marketing services in China; (2) JD Logistics (14%) which includes both internal and external logistic businesses; and (3) New businesses (4%) which consist of food delivery, Dada, JD Property, Jingxi and overseas businesses.
- JD had a market capitalization of RMB 325.1 bn as of 21 Aug 2025.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 21 Aug 2025While Chinese regulators have adopted a friendlier stance towards tech companies, any regulatory clampdowns may still adversely affect the business of JD (e.g. antitrust rules, data security & personal data protection laws).
Intensifying competition amongst Chinese eCommerce platforms with the entrance of new live-streaming/short-form video platforms and group buying discount platforms may result in slower topline growth and weaker EBITDA margin for JD as its increase its user/merchant incentives and promotional activities to defend its market share.
There are regulatory risks involving the use of variable interest entities (VIEs) to circumvent China’s restrictions on foreign ownership of Internet Content Providers (ICPs). Specifically, VIE transactions involving “change in control” will be subject to antitrust regulatory processes.
Key Metric
AS OF 21 Aug 2025| RMB mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 2Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 12.2% | 19.2% | 18.8% | 22.3% | 25.3% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 13.8% | 23.7% | 23.1% | 28.7% | 33.9% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 6.9% | 10.9% | 10.9% | 12.9% | 14.3% |
| Gross Leverage | 1.8x | 1.9x | 1.5x | 1.7x | 2.2x |
| Interest Coverage | 16.1x | 16.3x | 15.5x | 18.5x | 16.2x |
| EBITDA Margin | 2.0% | 3.3% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 3.6% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 14 Nov 2025We maintain our U/P recommendation on JD post its weak 3Q25 results. Revenues were ahead of expectations but EBITDA margin remained very weak at 0.8% due to losses for its new business initiatives such as food delivery and international expansion, FOCF stayed negative, net cash contracted, and debt metrics worsened. We expect JD’s debt metrics to further weaken over the next 6 months, and we see reduced rating headroom for JD and expect S&P to revise its positive outlook on JD back to stable. We think JD is expensive as it trades 10-15 bp tighter than Asia A-/A corporate, in-line to BABA and only 12 bp tighter than Tencent; this is much tighter than the average spread differential of 27 bp for A3 and A1 Asia corporate; as such, we think its bond has not priced in its weaker credit outlook.
Recommendation Reviewed: November 14, 2025
Recommendation Changed: September 05, 2025
Featured Issuers
Perusahaan Listrik Negara
Hyundai Motor
Republic of the Philippines