DOWNLOAD
Country: China
Alibaba
- Sector: Technology Media and Telecommunications
- Sub Sector: Technology
- Country: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 15 Sep 2025We maintain our O/P recommendation on BABA post its decent F1Q26 results; topline growth missed expectations, EBITDA margin fell 1 ppt, and FOCF turned negative; that said, gross leverage remained modest, with a strong net cash position intact. We view BABA as a core holding in China/Asia IG credits, and it is our preferred duration play. Its longer duration bonds trade ~40 bp wider than Chinese SOEs of similar tenors. In particular, we like BABA 2035. Within China tech credits, we prefer BABA over BIDU/JD, which are rated 1-2 notches lower but trade only marginally wider. We also view BABA to be more defensive compared to high beta BBB China tech credits while offering value.
Business Description
AS OF 15 Sep 2025- Founded in 1999, Alibaba is the largest retail commerce company in the world based on gross merchandise volume (GMV) as of 31 March 2023.
- The company's business segments comprise Taobao & Tmall Group (39% of F4Q25 revenue; China e-commerce incl. Taobao, Tmall, Taobao Deals, Taocaicai, 1688.com), International Digital Commerce (13%; incl. Lazada, AliExpress, Trendyol and Daraz), Cloud Intelligence Group (11%; incl. AliCloud, AI), logistic provider Cainiao (8%), Local Consumer Services (6%; incl. Ele.me, Amap), and Digital Media and Entertainment (2%, incl. Youku & Alibaba Pictures) and Others (21%; incl. Freshippo, Fliggy, Alibaba Health, Intelligent Information Platform, SunArt, DingTalk).
- Taobao/Tmall is Alibaba's core business and the main EBITA & cash generation unit of the group. Alibaba's annual active consumer exceeded 1 bn in June-2022.
- Alibaba had a market capitalization of RMB 2.7 tn as of 15 September 2025.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 15 Sep 2025While Chinese policymakers have adopted an increasingly friendly stance towards tech platforms, regulatory clampdown (e.g. anti-monopoly guidelines, data security laws, personal information protection laws) may still affect Alibaba as it increases compliance cost. There are regulatory risks given the corporate structure which uses variable interest entities (VIEs) to circumvent China’s restrictions on foreign ownership of Internet Content Providers (ICPs).
Intensifying competition amongst eCommerce platforms may result in slower topline growth and weaker EBITDA margins.
Alibaba does not control Alipay but relies on Alipay to conduct substantially all the payment processing and escrow services on its marketplaces.
US-China tension may escalate under the new Trump Administration, including additional chip sanctions, which may result in higher volatility. Failing to secure a stable supply of advanced AI chips and/(or) find domestic alternatives could weigh on the long-term AI development of Alibaba against international peers.
Key Metric
AS OF 15 Sep 2025| CNY BN | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | LTM F1Q26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 11.6% | 12.6% | 13.3% | 17.5% | 17.5% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 13.1% | 14.4% | 15.3% | 21.2% | 21.2% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 8.3% | 9.2% | 9.7% | 12.8% | 12.6% |
| Gross Leverage | 0.9x | 0.9x | 0.9x | 1.2x | 1.2x |
| Interest Coverage | 32.2x | 29.6x | 24.0x | 20.7x | 19.9x |
| EBITDA Margin | 18.5% | 20.2% | 20.3% | 19.9% | 19.6% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 05 Sep 2025We maintain our O/P recommendation on BABA post its decent F1Q26 results; topline growth missed expectations, EBITDA margin fell 1 ppt, and FOCF turned negative; that said, gross leverage remained modest, with a strong net cash position intact. We view BABA as a core holding in China/Asia IG credits, and it is our preferred duration play. Its longer duration bonds trade ~40 bp wider than Chinese SOEs of similar tenors. In particular, we like BABA 2035. Within China tech credits, we prefer BABA over BIDU/JD, which are rated 1-2 notches lower but trade only marginally wider. We also view BABA to be more defensive compared to high beta BBB China tech credits while offering value.
Recommendation Reviewed: September 05, 2025
Recommendation Changed: August 05, 2022
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.JD.com
- Sector: Media and TelecommunicationsTechnology
- Sub Sector: Technology
- Country: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 21 Aug 2025We maintain our M/P recommendation on JD post its weak 2Q25 results; topline growth was a strong beat, but EBITDA margin materially narrowed due to hefty spending for its food delivery business; FOCF also contracted and gross debt metrics weakened, but JD still retained a strong net cash position. JD trades largely in-line to Asia A- corp which we view as fair; while we expect JD’s gross debt metrics to temporarily weaken over 2H25 due to its hefty investments into food delivery, we do not expect downgrade risk for the credit given the strong performance of its core retail and logistic segments, and we expect JD to still maintain a strong net cash position over the 12 months. Amongst the A-rated China tech credits, we continue to prefer Alibaba and Tencent.
Business Description
AS OF 21 Aug 2025- JD is one of China's leading e-commerce and retail infrastructure service providers.
- JD has a large fulfillment infrastructure which includes over 1,600 warehouses operated by the company, and 2,000 cloud warehouses operated by third-party warehouse owner-operators under JD Logistics Open Warehouse Platform. Its warehouse network had an aggregate gross floor area of approximately over 32 mn square meters, as of 31 December 2024.
- JD has 3 operating segments, namely (1) JD Retail (82% of 2Q25 revenues), which includes JD Health and JD Industrials, and the segment mainly engages in online retail, online marketplace and marketing services in China; (2) JD Logistics (14%) which includes both internal and external logistic businesses; and (3) New businesses (4%) which consist of food delivery, Dada, JD Property, Jingxi and overseas businesses.
- JD had a market capitalization of RMB 325.1 bn as of 21 Aug 2025.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 21 Aug 2025While Chinese regulators have adopted a friendlier stance towards tech companies, any regulatory clampdowns may still adversely affect the business of JD (e.g. antitrust rules, data security & personal data protection laws).
Intensifying competition amongst Chinese eCommerce platforms with the entrance of new live-streaming/short-form video platforms and group buying discount platforms may result in slower topline growth and weaker EBITDA margin for JD as its increase its user/merchant incentives and promotional activities to defend its market share.
There are regulatory risks involving the use of variable interest entities (VIEs) to circumvent China’s restrictions on foreign ownership of Internet Content Providers (ICPs). Specifically, VIE transactions involving “change in control” will be subject to antitrust regulatory processes.
Key Metric
AS OF 21 Aug 2025| RMB mn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 2Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 12.2% | 19.2% | 18.8% | 22.3% | 25.3% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 13.8% | 23.7% | 23.1% | 28.7% | 33.9% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 6.9% | 10.9% | 10.9% | 12.9% | 14.3% |
| Gross Leverage | 1.8x | 1.9x | 1.5x | 1.7x | 2.2x |
| Interest Coverage | 16.1x | 16.3x | 15.5x | 18.5x | 16.2x |
| EBITDA Margin | 2.0% | 3.3% | 4.1% | 4.6% | 3.6% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 05 Sep 2025We also shift our recommendation on JD to Underperform from Market perform. JD trades only 1 bp wider than Asia A corporate and 5 bp tighter than Asia A- corporates; compared to Alibaba and Tencent, JD is only 17/8 bp wider, which is much tighter than the average spread differential of 24 bp for A3 and A1 Asia $ bonds. We think the current spreads of JD has not priced in its weaker credit outlook over the next 12 months given its rapid expansion within the food/retail on-demand delivery segment. We see reduced rating headroom for JD and expect S&P to revise its positive outlook on JD back to stable.
Recommendation Reviewed: September 05, 2025
Recommendation Changed: September 05, 2025
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Baidu
- Sector: Media and TelecommunicationsTechnology
- Sub Sector: Technology
- Country: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 21 Aug 2025We lowered our recommendation on Baidu to Underperform from Market perform post its weak 2Q25 results; revenues contracted and EBITDA margin fell sharply due to low advertising monetization rate; free operating cash flow was negative for a second consecutive quarter, and net cash narrowed; we expect Baidu’s credit outlook to further weaken over the next 12 months and we see reduced rating headroom at Moody’s as we expect gross leverage to trend higher in 2H25 to 2.8x. We view its bonds as rich compared to A-rated China tech and Asia corporate peers; for example, Baidu trades only 3-5 bp tighter than Alibaba and Tencent, and it is 11/6 bp tighter than Asia A- and A rated corporates; as a gauge, the average spread differential is 23 bp for A3 and A1 rated Asian $ bonds.
Business Description
AS OF 21 Aug 2025- Founded in 2000, Baidu started out as a search engine business and began its development into artificial intelligent (AI) since 2010.
- Baidu Core is the main revenue driver of the company (80% of 2Q25 revenues) which provides search-based, feed-based and other online marketing services (total: 50% of revenues), as well as products and services from new AI initiatives (31% of revenues); Baidu's AI initiatives include AI cloud (enterprise & public sector cloud, and personal cloud), Intelligent Group Driving (Apollo Go, Apollo auto solutions, and intelligent EVs under Jidu Auto), Mobile Ecosystem (Baidu App, ERNIE Bot, Haokan and Baidu Post), and other growth initiatives (ie. Xiaodu smart devices powered by DuerOS smart assistant and AI chips).
- iQiyi accounts for the remaining revenues of Baidu; iQIYI is an online video platform with a content library that includes licensed movies, television series, cartoons, and other programs.
- Baidu launched ERNIE bot in Mar-23, a generative AI chatbot powered by ERNIE, Baidu's in-house foundation model.
- Baidu has a market capitalization of RMB 238.4 bn as of 21 August 2025.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 21 Aug 2025Any regulatory clampdowns abroad and domestically (e.g. potential US investment ban, antitrust rules, data security and personal information protection laws) may adversely affect the business of Baidu. The interpretation of Chinese laws and regulations involves some degree of uncertainty.
There are regulatory risks given the corporate structure which uses variable interest entities (VIEs) to circumvent China’s restrictions on foreign ownership of Internet Content Providers (ICPs).
Baidu has made significant investments into long-term AI-related projects, which may take time to turn profitable. A potential escalation of the US chip restriction could have a material negative impact its AI related business (ie. cloud, ernie bot, autonomous driving).
Key Metric
AS OF 21 Aug 2025| RMB bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 2Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 29.7% | 28.5% | 25.0% | 22.5% | 24.4% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 42.2% | 39.8% | 33.4% | 29.0% | 32.2% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 24.1% | 23.4% | 20.8% | 18.5% | 20.4% |
| Gross Leverage | 3.3x | 2.8x | 2.2x | 2.0x | 2.5x |
| Interest Coverage | 8.2x | 11.4x | 12.1x | 13.8x | 12.8x |
| EBITDA Margin | 22.6% | 26.8% | 29.2% | 29.3% | 27.2% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 08 Sep 2025We lower our recommendation on Baidu to Underperform from Market perform post its weak 2Q25 results; revenues contracted and EBITDA margin fell sharply due to low advertising monetization rate; free operating cash flow was negative for a second consecutive quarter, and net cash narrowed; we expect Baidu’s credit outlook to further weaken over the next 12 months and we see reduced rating headroom at Moody’s as we expect gross leverage to trend higher in 2H25 to 2.8x. We view its bonds as rich compared to A-rated China tech and Asia corporate peers; for example, Baidu trades only 2-7 bp tighter than Alibaba and Tencent, and it is 11/5 bp tighter than Asia A- and A rated corporates; as a gauge, the average spread differential is 24 bp for A3 and A1 rated Asian $ bonds.
Recommendation Reviewed: September 08, 2025
Recommendation Changed: August 21, 2025
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor
How may we help you?
Search topics about wealth insights and investments.Tencent
- Sector: Technology Media and Telecommunications
- Sub Sector: Technology
- Country: China
Access this content:
If you are an existing investor, log in first to your Metrobank Wealth Manager account.
If you wish to start your wealth journey with us, click the “How To Sign Up” button.
Fundamental View
AS OF 10 Jun 2025We maintain our Outperform recommendation on Tencent post its decent 1Q25 results; topline accelerated, EBITDA margin expanded, free operating cash flow remained robust, and debt metrics remained modest. We expect Tencent’s topline growth to marginally accelerate in FY25, supported by its advertising, domestic/international gaming, fintech and cloud segments; we expect EBITDA margin to marginally improve as its better revenue mix offset the increased R&D spending for AI development; we expect FOCF to expand, and debt metrics to improve from 1Q25. We continue viewing Tencent as a core holding in China and Asia IG credits. We prefer its 2029/2041 notes for spread pick up against Chinese SOEs. We think Tencent is more attractive compared to BIDU/JD and more defensive that BBB China tech.
Business Description
AS OF 10 Jun 2025- Founded in November 1998, Tencent is a leading provider of Internet value added services in China. Since its establishment, Tencent has ventured into instant messaging, social networking, online payments, digital entertainment, and PC and smartphone gaming. Most recently, it has also forayed into high-tech areas such as artificial intelligence, and cloud computing.
- Tencent's leading Internet platforms in China include Weixin/WeChat (online messaging), QQ Instant Messenger (online messaging), Tencent Games (gaming), Tencent Video/Weixin Video Accounts (video platforms), WeChat Pay (payments), and Tencent Cloud. The combined monthly average users (MAU) of Weixin and Wechat reached 1.40 bn as of 31 March 2025.
- In 4Q24, 46% of revenues came from Value Added Services (which consist of Domestic Games, International Games, and Social Networks), 33% came from FinTech and Business Services (e.g. commercial payments and cloud), 19% from Online Advertising and 2% from Others.
- Tencent is currently primarily listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with a market capitalization of HKD 4.7 tn as of 10 June 2025.
Risk & Catalysts
AS OF 10 Jun 2025While Chinese regulators have adopted a more friendly stance towards tech companies, any regulatory clampdowns abroad and domestically (e.g. antitrust rules, data security, personal information protection laws) may affect Tencent’s business. Tencent’s gaming, music streaming, and online payment units are among those that have come under regulatory scrutiny in the past.
Tencent uses variable interest entities (VIEs) to circumvent China’s restrictions on foreign ownership of Internet Content Providers, which poses regulatory risks. Specifically, VIE transactions involving “change in control” will be subject to antitrust regulatory processes.
US-China tension may escalate under the new Trump Administration, including additional chip sanctions, which may result in higher volatility. Failing to secure a stable supply of advanced AI chips and/(or) find domestic alternatives could weigh on the long-term AI development of Tencent against international peers.
Key Metric
AS OF 10 Jun 2025| RMB bn | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | LTM 1Q25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt to Book Cap | 27.0% | 31.4% | 29.8% | 25.4% | 26.5% |
| Net Debt to Book Cap | 6.0% | 8.5% | 1.0% | 2.3% | 4.4% |
| Debt/Total Equity | 36.9% | 45.9% | 42.5% | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Debt/Total Assets | 20.1% | 22.8% | 23.5% | 20.1% | 21.1% |
| Gross Leverage | 1.7x | 1.9x | 1.6x | 1.3x | 1.4x |
| Net Leverage | 0.4x | 0.5x | 0.1x | 0.1x | 0.2x |
| Interest Coverage | 24.7x | 19.0x | 19.9x | 22.5x | 23.0x |
| EBITDA Margin | 34.9% | 34.3% | 38.9% | 42.4% | 43.2% |
CreditSight View Comment
AS OF 16 Sep 2025We maintain our O/P recommendation on Tencent post its strong 2Q25 results. Topline growth accelerated and beat expectations; EBITDA margin expanded; FOCF grew, and debt metrics improved. We expect its credit outlook to improve over the next 12 months. We view Tencent as a core holding in China and Asia IG credits, and it is our preferred duration play. Its longer duration bonds trade ~30 bp wider than Chinese SOEs of similar tenors. In particular, we like TENCNT 2041. Within China tech credits, we prefer Tencent over Baidu/JD, which are rated 1-3 notches lower but trade only marginally wider. We also view Tencent to be more defensive compared to high beta BBB China tech credits while offering value.
Recommendation Reviewed: September 16, 2025
Recommendation Changed: August 18, 2022
Featured Issuers
Bank of Philippine Islands
SK Hynix
Hyundai Motor