Metrobank US-Iran Risk Index: Framework of a deal


Metrobank’s US-Iran Risk Index settled at 126.7 on May 28th, 0.4% lower than the prior trading day.
Global oil prices edged lower as markets priced in news of a potential peace deal being finalized between the US and Iran. Al Jazeera reported that the tentative agreement includes provisions for an extended ceasefire, unrestricted navigation through the Strait of Hormuz—a key oil trading route, and the lifting of the US blockade.
Brent Crude closed at USD 93.71 per barrel on Thursday, UK trading, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
The benchmark 10-year US Treasury yield moved lower by nearly 4 basis points on Thursday, US trading, on market players’ optimism for a deal.
Meanwhile, the US dollar index pared its gains from the past two days, as peace deal hopes diverted flows away from the greenback. The dollar-peso exchange rate closed at 61.60 on Thursday, Philippine trading.
US President Donald Trump has reportedly yet to sign off on the deal, according to Al Jazeera. Thus, market players will likely still lean more risk-off until the deal gets approved. Reported military attacks between the two countries will also keep risk levels elevated in the meantime.
Metrobank still sees elevated risk and volatility in the near-term while a peace deal has not been approved. Oil prices are poised to stay high, as global supply remains constricted due to the war’s impact on Middle East oil facilities. Consequently, domestic inflation is expected to quicken in the coming months, which will put upward pressure on Philippine bond yields.
Moreover, Metrobank forecasts continued rate hikes by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) this year to stem accelerating inflation. Finally, Metrobank expects the dollar-peso exchange rate to stay elevated, as dollar demand weighs on a weak peso.

Metrobank’s US-Iran Risk Index measures the amount of risk that the ongoing conflict presents to financial markets. It considers the general risk sentiment of investors and inflationary pressure brought by the conflict. A value of 100 denotes a normal level of risk based on market levels prior to the conflict’s escalation, while values greater than 100 imply increasing levels of risk.