Metrobank US-Iran Risk Index: Another impasse


Metrobank’s US-Iran Risk Index settled at 135.0 on May 8th, 1.1% higher than the prior trading day.
Oil prices marginally rose on Friday, as hopes for a successful peace deal tempered the effects on the commodity of reignited military tensions in the Strait of Hormuz. Brent Crude closed at USD 101-per-barrel level on Friday, UK trading, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
The benchmark 10-year US Treasury yield edged lower, as global inflation expectations moderated. Meanwhile, the US dollar’s strength waned on Friday, as the ceasefire weighed on the currency’s safe-haven appeal, leading to the dollar-peso exchange rate closing below the 61-level once again at 60.61 on Friday, Philippine time.
Over the weekend, Al Jazeera reported that Iran rejected the US's peace proposal, leading to another impasse in negotiations between the two countries. US President Donald Trump has called Iran’s response “unacceptable,” a signal that tensions could persist. With oil prices already moving upward in early Monday trade, upside risks will likely remain this week as a lasting resolution to the conflict remains out-of-sight.
Metrobank still sees elevated risk and volatility in the near-term while a peace deal has not been struck. Oil prices are poised to stay high, as global supply remains constricted due to the war’s impact on Middle East oil facilities. Consequently, domestic inflation is expected to quicken even further in the coming months.
Moreover, Metrobank forecasts at least one more rate hike by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) this year to stem accelerating inflation. Finally, Metrobank expects the dollar-peso exchange rate to stay elevated, as dollar demand weighs on a weak peso.

Metrobank’s US-Iran Risk Index measures the amount of risk that the ongoing conflict presents to financial markets. It considers the general risk sentiment of investors and inflationary pressure brought by the conflict. A value of 100 denotes a normal level of risk based on market levels prior to the conflict’s escalation, while values greater than 100 imply increasing levels of risk.