Metrobank US-Iran Risk Index: Mixed signals


Metrobank’s US-Iran Risk Index settled at 134.4 on March 23, 2026, 9.1% lower than the level hit on March 20. This reversal can be attributed to financial market players pricing in less risk due to a fall in oil prices.
On Monday, US President Donald Trump announced he would postpone military strikes on Iran for five days after constructive talks between the two countries, with a potential deal on the horizon to settle the conflict. However, Iran has denied the discussions with the US. Regardless, global oil prices moved downward, as financial market players priced in hopes for a resolution to the conflict, with Brent crude settling below USD 100 per barrel for the first time in several days.
Meanwhile, the benchmark 10-year US Treasury yield closed lower by 3 basis points (bps), as inflation expectations slightly abated for the day. Dollar strength also waned, as safe-haven demand for the dollar went down, indicating that investors became marginally more risk-on with the news. Despite this, dollar strength still weighed on the peso during Monday’s trading session, Philippine time, with the local currency ending the day with its weakest close of PHP 60.30 per dollar.
Metrobank maintains the view that oil prices will stay elevated as long as the Strait of Hormuz, a critical transit point for global oil shipments, remains blocked. Conflicting statements from both sides of the conflict indicate uncertainty surrounding the timing of its resolution.
Meanwhile, high inflation due to rising oil prices will likely compel central banks globally to raise their policy interest rates this year, including the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). While dollar strength may be challenged as a result, we still see the dollar-peso exchange rate staying elevated in the near-term, as steady dollar demand weighs on a historically weak peso.

Metrobank’s US-Iran Risk Index measures the amount of risk that the ongoing conflict presents to financial markets. It considers the general risk sentiment of investors and inflationary pressures brought on by the conflict. A value of 100 denotes a normal level of risk based on market levels prior to the conflict’s escalation, while values greater than 100 imply increasing levels of risk.